Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2010, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:25:18 -0800
Reply-To:     Doug Noganav <vanagon@ASTOUND.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Doug Noganav <vanagon@ASTOUND.NET>
Subject:      Re: Feast your eyes....
Comments: To: Allan Streib <streib@CS.INDIANA.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I recently called a gal in the Sacramento area who had a nice red full dress 2wd van up for $6700 on craigs list. after watching it for a week it dropped to $3700 so I called the number even though I had zero cash. She said no buyers and needed to sell it to cover house payments. several people said they would buy it at 5 grand or so and never came through with the cash.

It was a CHERRY van with low miles and spanking interior and paint. No Porsche alloys or momo wheels but I would prefer not to pay for those anyway.

Told here that was a fantastic deal for that van. it had no issues. just a nice cherry vanagon. She said "come and buy it" but I too am not in $$$ position to do it or I certanily would have bought it.

Doug

----- Original Message ----- From: "Allan Streib" <streib@CS.INDIANA.EDU> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 11:11 AM Subject: Re: Feast your eyes....

> Well certainly, the market value of any item is what someone is willing > to pay for it. In this case it seems that a decent-looking Carat with a > freshly buffed wax job and armor-all on the rubber and a few aftermarket > accessories is worth $10K. > > I'm just pointing out, it has over 170,000 miles, a waterboxer engine, > wrong tires, and an accident history. I wouldn't pay $10K for that. If > someone else will, more power to the seller. And you're right, it's a > good data point for anyone trying to fight a low-balling insurance > adjuster. > > Allan > > Mark A Kippert <vanagon@KIPPERT.COM> writes: > > > Playing the devil's advocate here. > > > > I have to say I'm confused. Over the last year or so I've read a > > number of threads that relate to how our vans are often undervalued by > > insurance companies, as well as websites like Edmunds and such. We > > often feel our vans are worth much more than they are typically > > rated. Even after they have been wrecked and (properly) rebuilt we > > believe they should still hold their value. > > > > Now it seems odd that most of the posts on this thread feel that this > > van is going for far more than it's worth. Maybe it is, but I would > > think we should be happy as this helps us prove to insurance companies > > and such that they need to think again. > > > > Again...just playing devil's advocate. > > > > Mark K 1986 GL/2WD/4SPD > > -- > 1991 Vanagon GL


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.