Date:         Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:18:50 -0500
Reply-To:     Jim Johnston <inmytree1@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Johnston <inmytree1@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: List Rating G or PG?
Comments: To: Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <eccfedcc1001150903j6d16d9eeqb959d356844bc49c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

My two cents...

It's not that hard to refrain from cursing...I think a G-rated forum is much
easier to monitor...

While some may see some words as ok, others may not...

If we go with a PG rating, inevitably there will be a disagreement on what
is PG vs. what is non-PG...

I say Keep it simple...


Jim
Wilmington, NC


On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Michael Sullivan
<sandwichhead@gmail.com>wrote:

> Can we talk about this now?  G rated seems kinda hard since this list is
> for
> current/former/prospective vanagon owners and since you can't drive until
> 15-16 yrs of age, I believe that the rules should be of a PG-rated nature.
> Not a big issue since I can usually hold myself to the current rules.  Just
> would like to say a** or dam* and not have to go to Vanagon List
> Confession.  My .02.  Have a great day! :-)
> Michael in San Antonio
> 91GL AT 'Gringo'
> 73 Beetle
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM
> Subject: List Rating G or PG?
> To: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com
>
>
> Not to start anything(really)  but I suggest that this list rating be
> upgraded from 'G' to 'PG'.  I guess replies should be to the moderators so
> as not to cause problems, but a vote would be cool.
> Michael in San Antonio
> 91GL AT 'Gringo'
> 73 Beetle
>