Date:         Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:16:39 -0800
Reply-To:     BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: List Rating G or PG?
Comments: To: Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@GMAIL.COM>
Comments: cc: David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes

On Jan 15, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@GMAIL.COM>
wrote:

> Can we talk about this now?
>

Moderator Comment:

By all means, discuss this as a Friday item. So far the majority of
those who responded to your previous vote request have expressed a
preference to keeping the G-rating. David Beierl can confirm when he
gets a moment. I think only one or two listmembers said they didn't
care either way.

It doesn't take much effort to review postings for me especially since
I can use your hijacked smartphone account to save $$$.;-) You may
consider the hassle of posting reviews by the Moderators a non-issue.

You may not be aware of this so permit me to post a reminder. The List
has always been as a representative democracy but run closer to a
benevolent dictatorship. As one of your representatives, I vote to
keep the 'polite' level of conversation. Should David vote the
opposite, we will ask for Jim Arnott to break the tie.

I hope you are all having a fantastic Friday morning.


BenT