Date:         Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:53:17 -0500
Reply-To:     mcneely4@COX.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@COX.NET>
Subject:      Re: List Rating G or PG?
Comments: To: Jim Johnston <inmytree1@GMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=no

Seems to me the moderators made the rules, and we can follow them or go
elsewhere.  I curse a lot -- a great lot sometimes, though my profession
is one of the more "gentlemanly" ones.  But, if we're wanted not to
curse on here, then let's not.

David McNeely


On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jim Johnston wrote:

> My two cents...
>
> It's not that hard to refrain from cursing...I think a G-rated forum
> is much
> easier to monitor...
>
> While some may see some words as ok, others may not...
>
> If we go with a PG rating, inevitably there will be a disagreement on
> what
> is PG vs. what is non-PG...
>
> I say Keep it simple...
>
>
> Jim
> Wilmington, NC
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Michael Sullivan
> wrote:
>
>> Can we talk about this now?  G rated seems kinda hard since this list
>> is
>> for
>> current/former/prospective vanagon owners and since you can't drive
>> until
>> 15-16 yrs of age, I believe that the rules should be of a PG-rated
>> nature.
>> Not a big issue since I can usually hold myself to the current rules.
>> Just
>> would like to say a** or dam* and not have to go to Vanagon List
>> Confession.  My .02.  Have a great day! :-)
>> Michael in San Antonio
>> 91GL AT 'Gringo'
>> 73 Beetle
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Sullivan Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM
>> Subject: List Rating G or PG?
>> To: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com
>>
>>
>> Not to start anything(really)  but I suggest that this list rating be
>> upgraded from 'G' to 'PG'.  I guess replies should be to the
>> moderators so
>> as not to cause problems, but a vote would be cool.
>> Michael in San Antonio
>> 91GL AT 'Gringo'
>> 73 Beetle
>>