Date:         Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:12:24 -0800
Reply-To:     Stephen Grisanti <bike2vcu@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stephen Grisanti <bike2vcu@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Are Vanagons pretty?
Comments: To: Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <ccd73a11002272326pd602dbei96e89833c65f2634@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

"...the 59 caddilac coupe de' ville"

Oh, man, I'd like to agree but the '59 is overblown.  The '60 is just so much cleaner looking.  Not as iconic or attention grabbing, but better looking.  Let's see, the original Fiat 124 Spider with the tiny bumpers, the Alfa Romeo Giulia, the 289 Cobra, Porsche 904...actually, whatever starts readily, is paid for and hauls what I want is beautiful.  Sounds like a van.

Stephen

--- On Sun, 2/28/10, Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

From: Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Are Vanagons pretty?
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010, 2:26 AM

dear right lines
if i were to suggest a right vehicle i would suggest the 59 caddilac coupe
de' ville

having said that i will repeat that any vw van style i was behind the wheel
of turned more heads then any other vehicle i have ever owned or drove ...
except the 59 coupe de' ville
yours

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans <
scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote:

> I would not use the word 'pretty' to describe the shape.
>
> but ...the shape, and some nuances on it grows on me at least.
> I wake up where I can look out at least 10 vanagons.