Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2010, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:58:15 -0800
Reply-To:     chris and/or ruth <populuxe59@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         chris and/or ruth <populuxe59@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Friday question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Has Scientific American done this study post cell phone?? In my unscientific study I notice 80% of women are on the phone while driving. Really. Men? maybe 20%  and they seem worse at driving when on phone than women but they are both hazardous to our health and safety. I never asked my wife how she drove in traffic while on the phone with the 4-speed. Chris C GB, Wisconsin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unfortunately, I don't have a citation at hand, but will look for reports on the matter.  I know I read a report in Scientific American, which of course is not a primary source, but articles therein are drawn from research done by the authors.  I've also read at least one report in Science News, a magazine that summarizes recent reports.  The data in both cases were from insurance statistics, from driving records, and from surveys, but were reported in the fashion of accidents per mile driven and so on.   Scientific American is generally considered the tops of popular science reporting.  Given that the original reports were in peer reviewed journals (the only kind that Science News draws from, and the place that authors of Scientific American articles publish their original studies), I am sure that proper controls were used to adjust for miles driven, times of day, traffic conditions and so on.   Otherwise, the report would not have been in Scientific American.

DMc

---- Don Hundt <finishguy@gmail.com> wrote: > Dave, > I've always heard that about female drivers, but I've never seen an > actual study. I'd be interested in the methodology used to arrive at > those conclusions. Did the researchers take into account actual miles > driven, or did they just take insurance statistics on the rate of > accidents and tickets, men versus women? My assumption would be that > there are more miles logged by men than women, that could certainly > skew the data. > Don


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.