Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2010, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:47:40 -0700
Reply-To:     Old Volks Home <oldvolkshome@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Old Volks Home <oldvolkshome@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Now Preventative Maintenance, Was Do U carry spare ECU?
Comments: To: Tom Hargrave <thargrav@hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To:  <00a101cadc96$c161d5e0$442581a0$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Tom -

Keep in mind that for most of my life I have been a PM nut, thanks to my late father who was a Navy plane mechanic, tool and die machinist, aircraft model maker (display & wind tunnel testing for Northrop-Grumman) and a consumate hot rodder starting with Oldsmobiles ending up with VWs from 1961 onwards (how many 1950 split window bugs have you seen fully restored with a 2180 stuffed into the rear, tunnel trans and 356B brakes all round? This was a daily driver for 20 years for both him and myself). As with any VW (or other make) I've owned, PM always comes first. Even with living full-time in Ole Putt, I religiously change the oil & filter every 3K, the square fuel prefilter every other oil change (to prevent fuel pump starvation and overheating). Other tune up and rigorous inspections are done on a regular, periodic basis.

My experience in owning, repairing and driving VWs in almost 50 years has taught me to carry spares for this and that, depending on the model. I don't "plan for failure", but I go by the old fashioned Boy Scout saying "Be Prepared". Knowing what could go wrong in the worst location has enhanced my preparedness.

Regarding ECUs - the comparison of an ECU for the Wasserboxer Vanagon and the Mercedes is ludicrous. Vanagon Wassers aren't all that bad, but have a higher failure rate than the Benz. I'll continue to go with carrying one. YMMV -- Jim Thompson 84 GL 1.9 "Gloria" 84 Westfalia 2.1 "Ole Putt" 72 411 Station Wagon "Pug" 75 914 1.8 (No Name Yet) Full Timing Since March 1999 oldvolkshome@gmail.com http://www.oldvolkshome.com *********************************** On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Tom Hargrave <thargrav@hiwaay.net> wrote:

> I quit carrying spares & tool boxes over 20 years ago. I decided I was > "failing to plan" which kind of leads to "planning to fail". Also, I've > driven 40,000 - 55,000 miles / year over the past 10 years, most of these > miles in what most would consider old cars. > > But there is a method to my madness. I'm under the hood of my cars a lot. > Also, I replace items like belts & hoses & coolant & brake fluid & brakes & > tires when they should be serviced & not when they fail. Then I throw these > old parts out because there is no need for a old spare unless the one on the > car is about to fail. One other note - I replace belts & hoses with good > parts, not the cheap $4.00 crap from the local McParts store. I believe the > last Gates Green Stripe V belt I bought cost me $18.00 from NAPA while the > "supposedly" identical belt from a AutoZone or Advance Auto was in the $4.00 > range. > > I also inspect starters & alternators for brush wear. And I replace or > inspect other accessory items when they rack up a lot of miles. > > Your ECU should fall in the inspect & repair / replace category. > Disassemble it once every 10K miles & look at the wear stripe in the carbon. > If it shows a lot of wear then relocate the wiper BEFORE IT FAILS. If you > don't do this then you are "planning to fail" like I used to do 20 something > years ago. > > This may seem like a lot of work but it's nice to know that you can take > off on a long trip in a vehicle with over 200,000 miles on the clock and > expect to arrive at the other end with no issues. > > I have had some road failures but with one exception, none were in my > control and none could be fixed on the side of the road or with tools you'd > usually carry in a toolbox. The one exception was the alternator in my 87 > Mercedes 300SDL - the rear bearing locked up. But even with the alternator, > I borrowed what I needed from AutoZone. > > > Tom > www.kegkits.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of > miguel pacheco > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:35 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Do U carry spare ECU? > > Jim, in your case, not having the part you needed in a breakdown, would > make a far more interesting story. How about it, has it ever happened? > You carry far more than I do, and I'm pretty well equipped. > Miguel > > I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. > - Thomas A. Edison >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.