Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2010, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 13 May 2010 15:40:01 -0700
Reply-To:     Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: vanagon camper seating capacity
Comments: To: Robert Fisher <garciasghostvw@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <00d301caf2ea$95959e00$c0c0da00$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Well put Robert.

The forces at work in an accident are just too big for the human body to deal with.

Having grown up at the race track, I wouldn't consider driving without a seat belt, period.

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Robert Fisher <garciasghostvw@gmail.com>wrote:

> --snip-- > Is life only about money these day?? > --snip-- > > If you were put in the position of having to decide between your kid, your > money and your smug feelings of rebelliousness/contrariness, which would > you > choose? > > It has nothing to do with courage, it has to do with common sense. It's > relatively cheap to make sure your passengers are properly secured; and as > to kids being strapped in for 8 hours: it beats the hell out of them flying > free inside the car at 60 mph for a quarter-second. Besides, DVD players > and > DSis and such make it bearable (this from a guy that regularly travels > through completely unremarkable desert with three kids, and who once rode > most of the way from NYC to Knoxville on the rear-window deck of a Ford... > I > had a hell of sunburn.) > Sure, more lived than died back in the day, but you could say the same > thing > about the plague and WWII- it doesn't mean we should embrace those things. > It was precisely because so many died unnecessarily that these laws were > enacted, particularly in the cases of people that would've lived but didn't > because somebody else became a missile in the vehicle, or because somebody > lost control of their vehicle and killed somebody outside of it. > > I have to wonder if the people that come up with this crap have ever > actually been in a car wreck. They happen so fast, and with so much force, > that it's really impossible to comprehend unless one has been through that > or something similar. > > I was in two crashes when I was around 18, both of them quite similar in > terms of what happened to me in the car. In the first one I wasn't wearing > a > seat belt, and I nearly killed my passenger from flying around loose in the > car (at 240 pounds); I spent a week in the hospital with a concussion/brain > injury that nearly killed me and I had the ...interesting... experience of > being blind for about 15 hours with no idea of whether or not I would > regain > my vision. In the second, I had on my seat belt, and I got a bump on the > forehead. > > I've worn my seat belt ever since, and so has everyone who has ridden with > me. My step-dad (who is an engineer) always felt like my attitude and the > laws were a personal imposition on him until I pointed out to him that it > didn't do anybody else any good to be strapped in if he was flying loose > about the cabin at road speeds and of course losing what little control > over > the vehicle he might have had (as the driver) if he had been belted in- and > this was even after he'd sat with my mom by my hospital bed wondering if I > was going to make it that first time. > > In that first crash, the guy that hit me bounced across the road and > t-boned > an old couple waiting to turn at a stop sign, injuring them both, and the > woman severely (she had just removed her seat belt, since they were about > to > pull into a UPS place). Several people (including myself) independently > described to the police that the guy had let go of his wheel and was > bouncing around the cab of his truck with his hands up. He was cited for > abandoning control of his vehicle, as well as everything that happened > after > the initial impact with me. > > People seem to think their decisions with their vehicle are all about > _them_, and completely ignore the fact that they're also making that > decision for everyone that comes with their sphere of operation/influence. > You're not driving in your own little world. Think about those massacres in > the south-east involving dozens of vehicles that start with one bonehead > that's driving too fast for the pea-soup fog he's in. > > It often only takes one bad decision for everything to go wrong, but many > good decisions to make everything go right- tires, seat belts, whatever. > > Cya, > Robert >

-- Jake

1984 Vanagon GL 1.9 WBX 'The Grey Van' 1986 Westy Weekender/2.5 SOHC Suby 'Dixie'

Crescent Beach, BC

www.thebassspa.com www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.