Date:         Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:24:26 -0700
Reply-To:     BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: VW Van turns 60.
Comments: cc: "b1levi@YAHOO.COM" <b1levi@YAHOO.COM>,
          Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@turbovans.com>
In-Reply-To:  <083701cb0502$7f6574a0$6401a8c0@PROSPERITY>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Hey Fellas,

Let's bump this nostalgic trip into next Friday. It got here a day
early and has now overstayed a day already.


Cheers,

BenT
your MobMod

On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM
 > wrote:

> I hardly think $ 160 is too much to pay for what I got.
>
> now where are all those inexpensive 21 window ones you had for so
> little ?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "levi hawkins" <b1levi@YAHOO.COM>
> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 3:13 PM
> Subject: Re: VW Van turns 60.
>
>
> Yeah, but if he paid 160 w/out the engine he paid way too much!
> In
> the early/mid 70's I bought maybe 20 vw's, inc so42, 21 window, etal,
> and usually in the 300 range, running well, never more than 500.
>