Date:         Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:15:54 -0700
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Techron
Comments: To: Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

That's odd, to me anyway.
must be  regional thing.
I have a 76 Union station near me, it's 'my usual' fuel stop.
works fine in any vehicle I have ever put it in.
I have had bad Arco gas before though.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jake de Villiers" <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Techron


> Whereas I've put gas from 76 stations in three different Vanagons and had
> them run very poorly indeed.
>
> We no longer put that kind of gas in our vans.
>
> Jake
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Tom Buese <tombuese@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Not trying to start a flame war here, but I swear that my buses run
>> better when I run Chevron gas w/ the techron in it.
>>
>> YMMV,
>>
>> Mr. BZ-no scientific data to back up claim
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Tabe Johnson wrote:
>>
>>  So Techron is the cat's meow... Is there a reference for a study
>>> showing this, or is it just "everyone knows that Techron actually
>>> works and nothing else does"?
>>>
>>> tabe johnson/90mv
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jake
>
> 1984 Vanagon GL 1.9 WBX 'The Grey Van'
> 1986 Westy Weekender/2.5 SOHC Suby 'Dixie'
>
> Crescent Beach, BC
>
> www.thebassspa.com
> www.crescentbeachguitar.com
> http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27