Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2010, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 4 Jul 2010 12:41:56 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Parking brake pressure (was I've had it)
Comments: To: mcneely4@COX.NET
In-Reply-To:  <20100704083537.13GEG.950965.imail@eastrmwml37>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 08:35 AM 7/4/2010 Sunday, Dave Mcneely wrote: >Now, if drum brakes are less effective than disc brakes, why do so >many vehicles have rear drums? Vanagon content here in that >vanagons are built that way.

Drum brakes were the standard automotive brake for many many years, although my grandmother's Studebaker still used band brakes. Some time in the sixties IIRC disk brakes began to be available, and there was discussion in the magazines like Motor Trend and Road & Track as to whether the handling problems from increase in unsprung weight was a greater disadvantage than any increase in brake performance would make up for.

Clearly the universe decided otherwise, and AFAIK front drum brakes have entirely disappeared (I wonder what the Trabant used?). Early systems were mostly dual-piston, with the caliper fixed in place; my Saab 96 had a pivoting system where the pads started out very thick on one side and were even when they were worn out. More recently single-piston designs with sliding calipers have been popular as they're cheaper to build.

Until lately nobody considered putting disk brakes on rear wheels because the rears do so little actual braking that it doesn't really make sense -- you'd end up with more unsprung weight, which is bad, with no particular advantage in braking, since the rear brakes in general have to be restrained from using their full capacity anyway.

Disk brakes do have two advantages for rear brakes -- they are inherently self-adjusting, and they look cool -- at least until they get all rusty. I'm waiting to see what happens when all these fancy cars with transparent wheels start getting rusty disks and calipers; will they look so pretty then? The heat from braking accelerates corrosion...

But if you want my bet as to why cars are being built with rear disk brakes (leaving aside race cars) -- I suspect it is purely cosmetic.

Yours, David


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.