Date:         Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:57:50 -0700
Reply-To:     Jay lefstein <jleftbrane@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jay lefstein <jleftbrane@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Dash Cluster Needed, '86+
Comments: To: Bill Glenn <idahobill@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <vanagon%2010071401571748@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I agree accept low or high miledge make little differance... The leval and quality of maintence makes all the differance to me

Thank you,
Jay Lefstein.
Sent from my mobile device.

On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Bill Glenn <idahobill@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> Scott Daniel wrote,"Man, that's pretty picky, odometer required."
> 
> Greg Potts wrote,"Me, I'd argue with the guy."
> 
> 
> When considering the purchase of a used vehicle, the potential buyer needs

> to be able to determine just how used it is so as to judge the worth of the
> vehicle.  Documented maintenance and the distance the vehicle has travelled
> are key elements in making the judgment as to worth.  Each and every member
> of this list is likely to value a low-mileage, well-maintained vehicle
> higher than a high-mileage, poorly-maintained vehicle, all else being
> equal.  To suggest that the governmentally-mandated presence of a working
> odometer, in advance of the issuance of a Certificate of Title, is an
> unreasonable regulatory burden, ignores the potential for abuse and
> outright fraud in the used-vehicle market.  Who among you does not want to

> know, and possibly confirm using Carfax or AutoCheck, the mileage of a
> vehicle being considered for purchase?