Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2010, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:31:56 -0700
Reply-To:     Marc Sayer <marcsayer@HUGHES.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Marc Sayer <marcsayer@HUGHES.NET>
Subject:      Re: Mellow Yellow got hitted
In-Reply-To:  <AANLkTilRMme0OHGwMGqIeT4SYGxbpbt4LVTbIswbI09e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Add me to your list of people who have been screwed by insurance companies. They are happy to take your premiums (my wife and I own and insure 5 cars - they charge us full premiums for 5 cars, with only 2 drivers, how's that for starting off with a scam?). My experience covers 3 states, 4 companies, and almost 40 years, and I have never once had a good experience with a claim. Back in 1978 my 1970 Fiat 124 had just had $6k worth of resto and upgrade work done on it. The only thing missing was the passenger's seat and door panel. They were in my garage waiting to be installed. They valued the car at $500 and totaled it. But they wanted me to pay $1000 to get it back as salvage! (now I know a Fiat 124 is not a big dollar car, but you can tell by what I spent on it that it was in exquisite condition and was not a $500 car. Their excuse? Well that make/model wasn't wroth much, plus it was missing so many parts. And of course parts in my possession but not on the car were not "part of the car." Their attitude was sue us, you can't possibly afford to match our resources. We'll drown you in court costs and you'll end up losing a small fortune, so be our guest refuse this offer and take us to court. They were more than willing to spend 2, 3, or more times what my claim was really worth, in court costs. They would rather spend the money setting a precedent and letting folks know they had better take what's offered. Had an equally bad experience with my 64 Type 2, my 72 MGB, my wife's 84 Volvo, my 79 Datsun 810 wagon, My 81 280ZXT, need I go on? Every time it comes to paying out for a covered loss, they weasel and cheat and do whatever they can to not pay out fairly. If an individual tried to start selling the same thing and conducting business the same way, they'd be charged with fraud. But the insurance industry is BIG business and has a very, very powerful lobby (notice how all sorts of insurance is slowly becoming madatory, how many industries can manage that trick?), so they can get away with this crap. My homeowner's insurance agent refused to write a policy for our new home when we moved in 2005. After having been with them for almost 30 years. When I asked why she said it was because I ran a dog rescue out of my home. Turns out they she saw a story about my rescue on TV 2 years before. Also turns out that while she was taking my premiums for those 2 years, she admitted they would not have covered me for anything for that period, because of my dog rescue. When I asked her why she didn't contact me to adjust my policy or cancel, she told me it wasn't her job to make sure I kept them informed, and that all she was required to do was let the home office know that they didn't need to cover me because I was running the rescue. If I wanted to alter or cancel my policy, that was my responsibility. So I asked her why they didn't just cancel me instead of continuing to take my premiums when they had no intention of insuring me against any claims. In other words why were they fraudulently taking my premiums? Never could get a straight answer. That's the insurance business as a whole. Maybe there are occasional cases where an insured is treated fairly, but they are the exception. An Insurance agency is in business to make a profit. And there are big profits to be made if you avoid paying out on losses. Look at how many car insurance ads you see on TV and compare that to any other industry. Those ads are not cheap and they only way they can afford to run them is to overcharge and underpay. Insurance started out as a gambling scheme, and it is as crooked and biased toward "the house" as any other form of gambling.

--

Marc Sayer Journalist, Photographer, Dog Trainer (APDT member #062956) Board member - Western States Great Dane Rescue Association Director of Operations& Training - Deaf Dane Rescue Inc. Oakridge, OR USA

My Homepage -http://gracieland.org Deaf Dane Rescue -http://deafdane.org White Danes Yahoo Group -http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/whitedanes Western States Great Dane Rescue Association -http://wsgdra.org RescueWatchdogs -http://rescuewatchdogs.org Association of Pet Dog Trainers -http://APDT.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.