Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2010, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 8 Aug 2010 09:55:05 -0700
Reply-To:     Marc Sayer <marcsayer@HUGHES.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Marc Sayer <marcsayer@HUGHES.NET>
Subject:      Re: Mystery engine cutouts
In-Reply-To:  <832806.89376.qm@web110616.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

It doesn't matter whether he was "careless" or not. He was driving, his car hit the baywindow. That's all that matters in terms of a claim, UNLESS his insurance company can prove that the driver of the car he supposedly swerved to avoid was the root cause of the accident. Then that driver's insurance will have to pay at least part of both the other drivers' claims. That is what this guy's insurance is aiming at, laying the responsibility on the car he "swerved" to avoid. They are trying to promote a scenario where their driver was just another victim, as would have been the case had the car he swerved to avoid actually hit him and knocked him into the baywindow. You never know how a court will decide, but this sounds pretty lame, given the police reports. This is going to be yet another example of insurance companies taking premiums and then desperately trying to duck paying out on claims.

> IN OTHER NEWS, The insurance company for the driver of the car that ran > into the baywindow (the guy that caused the collision) has told the > owner of the baywindow that they are not going to be paying any claims > because the driver swerved to avoid an oncoming car so was not at fault. > Police report cites him for "careless driving." He verbally said that he > was looking down when driving and when he looked up he saw the oncoming > car. Whatever. It's not clear to me how the insurance company doesn't > feel it needs to pay for damages when their driver was driving > carelessly. I've been out of town and will talk to that insurance > company claims adjuster tomorrow. > > -- > Rocky J Squirrel > 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana") > 74 Westrailia: (Ladybug Trailer company, San Juan Capistrano, Calif.) > Bend, OR > KG6RCRs > > > > > > >

--

Marc Sayer Journalist, Photographer, Dog Trainer (APDT member #062956) Board member - Western States Great Dane Rescue Association Director of Operations& Training - Deaf Dane Rescue Inc. Oakridge, OR USA

My Homepage - http://gracieland.org Deaf Dane Rescue - http://deafdane.org White Danes Yahoo Group - http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/whitedanes Western States Great Dane Rescue Association - http://wsgdra.org RescueWatchdogs - http://rescuewatchdogs.org Association of Pet Dog Trainers - http://APDT.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.