Date:         Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:29:35 -0700
Reply-To:     BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Potts new Vanagon(s)
Comments: To: "mcneely4@COX.NET" <mcneely4@COX.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <20100826154437.EK8YL.1597502.imail@eastrmwml42>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

David,

That posting was just talking about a T2 Type II in the media. This thread compares same to a T3 Type II (Vanagon). Nothing wrong with talking about T2's on their own but more appropriate for Fridays except on the Type 2 forum.;-)


BenT
Mod

On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@COX.NET> wrote:

> When I posted a reference to a bus used as a prop on a TV show being sold at auction on here, I got a "bad boy" note from a moderator.
> 
> Personally, I call my Volkswagen Vanagon GL Campmobile "an old Volkswagen Bus."  Anyone who doesn't like that has a problem,  but I don't have a problem.
> 
> McNeely
> 
> ---- Jeff Lincoln <magikvw@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>> Cesar -
>> 
>> I think in the vast majority of situations you would be accepted by both
>> groups. In my eyes Splittie, Bay, Vanagon - AC or WC - they are all buses. I
>> don't include the Eurovans (sorry) because they look so much like a modern
>> mini-van - however they are still a VW and I'd still honk and wave.
>> 
>> So I say honk and wave away - I'd bet most of the time you get the same in
>> return and for those who do not - well they just don't get it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>>