---- Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@q.com> wrote: > Wonder where the line is drawn between junk vehicle and yard art? right here? junk vehicle -------------------------- yard art Seriously, maybe between the junk vehicle and an actual piece of artwork, not made of a junk vehicle. If the displayers wanted to construct a vehicle of plywood, or metal work, and paint it up to resemble a hippy bus, I'm sure no one would object, unless there are ordinances about such things (and there should not be -- but who knows what city fathers will come up with in their self important infinite wisdom). But a junk vehicle is a junk vehicle, no matter it's paint job. DMc
> > Karl Wolz > > > |Perhaps abandoned was not the proper word to use. But my remarks stand > |otherwise. Getting it running? Here is a quote from the article: > | > |"The vehicle, which is now minus an engine and has been parked on the > |family's lawn since the spring .... ." > -- David McNeely |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.