Comparing a 35,000 to 50,000 KB WAV file with a 5,000KB MP3 is silly. The difference in the amount of musical information conveyed is gigantic. Its like the difference between AM radio and Hi-Fi. Kids who have been raised on hyper-compressed TV, movies and dance tracks may have never had an opportunity to hear what music - instruments and voices - sound like and that's a shame. Tell me you like the convenience but please don't tell me there's no difference in the audio quality! ;) Jake On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> wrote: > RE: Audio Quality, CD vs MP3 vs WMA etc. > > Interesting observations. Just for kicks I'm going to take a couple of > tracks from a good CD, rip as WMA and MP3, burn and then compare in my head > unit. With my lousy ears and the inexpensive Pioneer head unit and cheap > speakers I doubt that I'll be able to hear any difference but it's worth > playing with. >
-- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1.9 WBX 'The Grey Van' 1986 Westy Weekender/2.5 SOHC Suby 'Dixie' Crescent Beach, BC www.thebassspa.com www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27 |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.