Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2010, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:09:01 -0800
Reply-To:     Alistair Bell <albell@SHAW.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Alistair Bell <albell@SHAW.CA>
Subject:      Re: Actual burn times with Mr Buddy MH9B (Little Buddy)
Comments: To: miguel pacheco <mundopacheco@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <AANLkTik7phk2AofjOMekNNO0z-w3pLU_8qN=T0znJvq4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

2-4 cups a day breathing?

I got it from a respirologist that it was 135 ml over 8 hrs (sleeping) for 160 lb person in -5 C temp. I posted the calculations.

Why not back up your assertions with data instead of criticising?

The OP, Courtney, did find his answer btw, and he also was pleased with my calculation of water produce by burning propane in a cat. type heater.

I don't see why this outcome should annoy you so much and you have to keep being sanrky

:)

alistair

On 9-Nov-10, at 7:25 PM, miguel pacheco wrote:

Uhm, I did post a clarification, (and a smiley face, which changes everything, doesn't it?) but it's not here for some reason......my point was not to be snarky, but rather, to point out, in my own, abstract fashion, that Courtney's question was not answered by that elaborate calculation. Furthermore (and to add to the crime) three cups of water in six hours in insignificant. Consider that the average human expels 2 to 4 cups of water a day, just by breathing, but the condensation of same is largely dependant on ventilation. If you had sufficient ventilation, these AND the three might be expelled right out the window, not to mention that when you awaken, the opening and closing of doors alone will increase the rate of evaporation, rendering those three cups of water even more insignificant. It's comical that Sullivan, the 'not a math guy,' gave the best, and only, applicable answer, while everyone else, including the OP, lost sight of the original question. Now that's snarky. Miguel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.