Date:         Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:20:14 -0800
Reply-To:     Jay lefstein <jleftbrane@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jay lefstein <jleftbrane@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: MOD - Community watchdogs
Comments: To: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <4d01280b.cefde50a.6d0c.5735@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I try not to reply to often because i know i make statements before i fully think about them.... 

I am a fairly decent human yet sometimes find humour in slightly crass subject lines such as the one this started from..
I have to say this seems like the politics that give religions a bad rap...
Who cares if skinny's dick is also short??? 

Just worry about pleasing your own woman and let those who arent shy be who they are ;)
Is it friday yet?? 

If so i will be working on my never ending prop shaft issues on my syncro westy.. 

Much love to all my vw vanagon peeps

Also keep an eye out for my upcoming blog;

vwvanonymaus

Thank you
J
Sent from an undisclosed cyber machine

On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:03 AM, David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote:

> Dear Jake,
> 
> At 01:45 PM 12/9/2010, Jake de Villiers wrote:
>> Nice David!  You're going to ban me for mentioning that the Emperor
>> has no clothes, but the Emperor gets no sanction?
> 
> While the subject line in question makes us grownups wince, it should
> cause no concern in the hearts of the innocent; and since it isn't an
> acronym that needs explaining there is no particular reason for them
> to inquire about it.  Given the nature of the inquiry it would be
> difficult to avoid naming the place -- it could be circumlocuted
> fairly easily in the body but not in the subject; and again given the
> nature of the inquiry putting the name of the establishment in the
> subject is a practical necessity.
> 
> Allowing it is a judgment call.  I saw it, thought about it, decided
> to allow it; all the while wincing to beat the band.  YMMV.
> 
> 
>> Sounds like modern US politics to me.
> 
> I wouldn't know, sorry.
> 
> Best,
> David