On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Peter T. Owsianowski < pnoceanwesty@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow. I freaked out driving our 2.1 up the hill and back into barn with no > coolant once. >
"Rubber Headgaskets"? What were they thinking when they built that? I can see now why anyone who still has a running WBX motor might be a bit 'gunshy' about running a little low on coolant....and why those motors have such a reputation for reliability issues and frequent expensive rebuilding of the top of them.. I have heard this mentioned before...the O-rings to keep the coolant in....I guess I need to look sometime at a Bently for the WBX motor and see how the stock motor was put together.. Sounds a bit 'iffy'....but I guess they work well enough... Does anyone know why they never brought the South African inline motor to world wide production for the vanagon? Just curious if that motor had issues, too, that precluded it being adopted world-wide, since even VW dealers of old would say...."Waterboxers have weak heads" or some variation of that.... Don Hanson |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.