Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2010, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:19:18 -0500
Reply-To:     craig cowan <phishman068@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         craig cowan <phishman068@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: ebay Vanagon with extra headroom - poptop only - no roof.
Comments: To: Thomas Buese <tombuese@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:  <92653F8D-6EA6-4CB7-8027-EBFAC9AA46DD@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes and No. The 'hole' in a westy is at least double the size of the sunroof hole. Furthermore, the sunroof busses have a thick rib that surrounds the hole and gives rigidity, as well as a great deal of extra "stuff" up there (you even loose 1.25'' of headroom inside as a result!~)

I was under the impression that that cross brace was the only real strengthener on the westy, but it's been a while since i've cut up a westy (but I have done several). Since that cross brace is in place on this westy in question, I don't really see the big deal. The wooden bunks aren't really secured to anything in any way that adds any strength, and at least at first glance, that's all the appears to me to be missing.

I think i'd drive around like that without much hesitation, but further investigation may be required.

-Craig

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Buese <tombuese@comcast.net> wrote:

> In my professional experience w/ structural engineering, I believe that the > Westy cross brace in the ceiling is more for the structural support of the > upper bunk than for cross bracing the roof-sunroof models don't have that > brace, right Craig? > > YMMV, > > Mr. BZ-you can never have too much headroom, but where do you store your > stuff? > > > > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 7:40 AM, craig cowan wrote: > > Ahh. I guess they did pull out some structural stuff. >> In that case, it may be somewhat compromised. How much? It's hard to say. >> >> -Craig >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 7:30 PM, craig cowan <phishman068@gmail.com >>> >wrote: >>> >>> It's only missing the top bunks right? They're not structural.... >>>> So, "YES"? >>>> >>>> It looks good! >>>> If you don't use your top bunks, that looks slick! >>>> >>>> >>> BUT it is missing all the sheet metal part of the top in that area and >>> maybe more important the very beefy cross brace at the front of the bunk >>> the VW/Westfalia put in. >>> >>> >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.