Date:         Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:14:00 -0600
Reply-To:     Tom Hargrave <thargrav@HIWAAY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Tom Hargrave <thargrav@HIWAAY.NET>
Subject:      Re: Climbing
Comments: To: Mike South <msouth@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <AANLkTi=OWZpFvONaZkveVdbjob-DH1iUBFmMo1ZzDJj9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I think we've all had our fair share of that!



Tom

www.towercooler.com



From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of
Mike South
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 7:53 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: Climbing



On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Greg Potts <greg@pottsfamily.ca> wrote:

> Hi Scott,
>
> We're talking air-cooled here. In which case a cylinder head temp gauge
> is far more effective than an oil gauge. I have both in my aircooled
> bus, plus an oil pressure gauge as well. Oil temp will trend on a hill,
> but MUCH, MUCH slower than the CHT. By the time the oil gets hot enough
> to notice you can have the heads FAR too hot, and the valve seats will
> fall out as it cools.
>
> Ask me how I know.


Wait, wait, let me guess! Is the answer "applied stupidity"?

:)

mike

  _____

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3408 - Release Date: 01/28/11