Date:         Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:39:21 -0800
Reply-To:     "Mark L. Hineline" <hineline@OCOTILLOFIELD.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Mark L. Hineline" <hineline@OCOTILLOFIELD.NET>
Subject:      Re: Friday: Is it a Van or what?
Comments: To: Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <109501cbc4ba$12028fb0$6501a8c0@PROSPERITY>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Got to disagree a little, Scott. I think that aircooled Vanagons
should be called buses. But a WBX is not a bus.

If its idling and you close your eyes, and take it it with your nose
and your ears, it's a definitely a bus.


On Feb 4, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote:

> short comment ..
> I defenitly don't think Vanagons should be called  a 'Bus'

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.