Does this stretch bolt issue apply to a 2.0 air cooled? thanks -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Scott Daniel - Turbovans Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:27 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Originally: JLP rebuilt wbxr engines in Denver hi.. talking with an engine supplier I'm getting rebuilt 2.1 from .. they say 2.1's do that due to the stretch rod bolts eventually stretching more .. that usually leads to increased oil clearance on the rods .. which may lead to rod failure, thus ventilating the case. they say 1.9's don't do that due to using a non-stretch type rod bolt..which they assemble 2.1's with now. and with the longer stroke of the 2.1 there is the increased angle affect, as pointed out by Dennis yesterday. btw, this engine rebuilding company I'm talking to will even built a 2.1 in a 1.9 case since some people think the 1.9 case is stronger .. but they say the cases are identical in construction .. and it's the 2.1 rod bolts that are the cause of blown 2.1's. Scott |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.