>The worldwide average background exposure is about 250 millirems >(2.5 millisieverts) a year. People in Denver get about twice that >because of the altitude. Various places get more, some a lot >more. Granite is radioactive, so is coal and seawater so people in >New Hampshire get a slightly higher exposure. > >A chest or abdomen CT scan delivers somewhat over twice the average >yearly background dose, whereas a static chest xray adds only a very tiny dose. For context, the allowed yearly industrial exposure for a non-pregnant worker in the US is 5,000 millirems taken over the entire body, or 50,000 millirems to any individual organ, or 15,000 millirems to the eye, or 50,000 millirems to the skin. Pregnant women are limited to an industrial dose of 500 millirems in addition to background radiation, and it's considered desirable that members of the general public receive no more than 100 millirems of industrial radiation per year. There's an anomaly in that it appears that airline pilots who do transpolar flights normally receive higher radiation doses than any other industrial workers, but up until now their exposure is not monitored. I personally expect that will be changing. Yours, David |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.