Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:24:47 -0700
Reply-To: Paul <wognacious@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Paul <wognacious@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: camper conversion other than Volkswagen
In-Reply-To: <C2CF0A5FE0834CCDBA33BF06D36E8A36@troyb5bff49d63>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Troy,
Dude it was phryday, I was just having a little fun. I'm sure that you love
your Westy or why else would you be here? Based on your list of investments
I'd say you are hooked, line and sinker. I'm really sorry about the Judas
thing and I apologize if I offended you. I was kinda buzzed at the time and
just riffing, Urban Dictionary:
riffing<http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=riffing>.
I should know better than to chime in when I'm in that state. Problem is
that's the state I live in, you know Kalifornia. Bay Area
Kalifornia.................home of the World Series Champion San Francisco
Giants. I'm actually an A's fan but I think I'm getting off topic and it's
not phryday any more...
Happy Trails,
Paul
Why didn't you slam on Scott too. I demand equal rebutting. Oops there I go
again.........sorry
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Troy <colorworks@gci.net> wrote:
> Hey Paul, perhaps you need to take a puff off of that funny smelling
> cigarette and chill! This is a Friday topic and yes it's off topic. As of
> tomorrow I put back on my vanagon hat (never really took it off ) and
> resume normal on topic discussions . I have $23,000 invested in my 89
> Vanagon. It has a Subaru 2.2 with 14K on it, rebuilt transmission with
> Peloquin limited slip differential from Ken at German transaxle, new CV's,
> shocks, 16 inch tires, new brakes, new fridge, some new upholstery, the list
> goes on. I have contributed quite a few ideas to the list. I have a right to
> be here. I'm not trying to convert anybody. Sorry you feel so threatened by
> talk of another van conversion. I have no intentions of selling my beloved
> westy, I was merely asking folks to comment (good or bad) about this van I
> never heard of called a "Roadtrek", which coincidentally was mentioned on a
> review of the "California" T5. I posted the comment according to list rules
> for off topic subjects. So, I think you've made your contribution! Take it
> easy man, I'm on your side! The small 170 roadtrek is actually only 2 feet
> longer than the Vanagon and about 8" wider. Not exactly your typical RV.
> I'm sure they have their place, just as our westy's do.
>
> Troy
>
>
>
> You're on the wrong list. This place is for people who have Vanagons and
> want to share Vanagon experiences, good and or bad, with each other. I come
> to this place to be with my kind. I don't want to be led into temptation
> with talk about other stuff out there you Judas. Go away, sell your Vanagon
> and submit youself to the lifestlye of the "RV" people. Buy some bright
> colored plaid polyester pants that go up to your armpits, let your nose and
> ear hair grow out and toss out that fake grass stuff to put your lawn chair
> on and mumble about those people in the VW bus type thing parked next to you
> and the funny smelling cigaretts some of us smoke. But don't come here to
> talk about whatever it is that you were talking about that pissed me off on
> a Fryday night on the "VANAGON" list.
> just venting but some of it was real,
> Paul Rogers
> proud owner of a 85 WWW
>
>
|