Date:         Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:35:13 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: fresh water level sensor
Comments: To: Troy <colorworks@gci.net>
In-Reply-To:  <0841FA8192134080909612FBABAC494E@troyb5bff49d63>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 06:19 PM 3/24/2011, Troy wrote:
>all over.  It's not a bad design, just poorly executed and think we
>are all in agreement on that;)

If it didn't have to be backward-compatible with the electrode-type
sensor it probably wouldn't fail if it got a drop of water inside.

For that matter if the board were dip-coated with something
waterproof it would be more robust that way.

Yrs,
d

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.