Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2011, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:00:07 -0700
Reply-To:     Daniel Rotblatt <d.rotblatt@VERIZON.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Daniel Rotblatt <d.rotblatt@VERIZON.NET>
Subject:      Re: Buying a Van
Comments: To: Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <090601cbfa64$dcf553d0$6401a8c0@PROSPERITY>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

Scott,

Thanks for the input. I remember now that it is a 1.8. Good info on the difference between CIS and EFI. I'll look to see. From what I know on the tranny, the transaxle on the diesel has the starter motor on the top while the air cooled one has the starter off to one side. The 85 weekender is a westfalia (regular pop top) but weekender inside - description says "fold out bed, swing arm table, rear facing seat." I figure if I get that with the extra engine I'll rebuild at least the top end if the compression, etc. checks out and then swap it out and know I have a reliable engine. And while I'm doing that I can still drive it!

Dan L.A. CA

On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote:

> Hi Dan .. > all sounds good. > on the 82 Diesel ...Westy I assume.. > the inline four gas engines are usually a 1.8 .. > or sometimes a 2.0 with a 1.8 head on it. > there are two kinds of fuel injection it could have ..one is CIS > easily > identified by numerous braided fuel lines running 'everywhere' almost > ....bit of a messy tangled engine compartment.. > and that fuel injection is regarded as problematic. > > the 'good kind' of EFI is electronically controlled ...identified > by having > just wires to a fuel rail.. > and no braided fuel lines running around. That's the much better > set up. > > the trans on the 82 diesel, if it's a gas engine and it 'goes well' > like 65 > easily ...75 etc it most likely has already had a DK 4 speed from an > air-cooled vanagon put in it. > that is the standard trans upgrade for 82 diesel vanagons. > in 83, in waterboxers they went to a whole other style of shift > linkage > and somewhat different trans ..in diesels it's the rare 5 speed > that year., > also with the improved shift linkage. > > if it's screamin' its guts out at 60 to 65 ...it's likely the stock > 82 DV > 'DZ' code trans .. > if it'll do 65 to 70, even 75 without extreme strain, it's likely been > swapped to the proper DK trans from an air--cooled vanagon. > > I have heard of random spot checks in Ca to make sure a vehicle is > still > really a diesel. > Don't know first hand of a case.. > but I have read that before. > > on the 85 .. > Weekenders are in many ways the best body configuration . ( well, not > counting Adventurewagons ) > they have the most interior volume of any factory vanagon .. > the head room is nice.. a skylight or bronze-gold plexiglass plain > solid > skylight is really nice to have in them. > 85's usually have a skylight in the poptop. 82's never do that > I've seen. > > the full rear bench seat with big trunk under it in the > Weekdender....., all > nice. > I've had two 85 poptop vans...the first one a Wolfsburg Weekender.. > very desireable body configuration oin a vanagon I say. Both vans > will hold > value nicely if they're decent and taken care of. > > as for he spare used 1.9 wbx ....good to have one .. > but unless it's medium fresh ..they usually really need head > gaskets and I > like to have a regular valve job done on the heads at then too. > > sounds like fun. > > re > "$5k is my top dollar or i would go for an > '86-91 model." > > usually $ 5K will not get an 86 to 91 Westy unless it needs a LOT. > those can be up to twenty grand even sometimes. > 7 passenger no problem ......( $ 5K still on the low side ) but 86 > to 91 > Westy's if at all good are most often much more than > $5K ...especially on > the west coast. > > Scott > www.turbovans.com > southern oregon .. > long time califiornian. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Rotblatt" <d.rotblatt@VERIZON.NET> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:55 PM > Subject: Buying a Van > > >> Hi all. I'm new here, just now shopping for a vanagon westfalia. I >> was wondering if I could get some input on some vans available in the >> area that I'm interested in. I'll be looking at them this coming week >> and wanted to get some input as to what to look for. I'll modify any >> info I get with the condition of the car as i see it - especially >> rust (which I know is a real issue). I've done a lot of reading and >> I am mechanically inclined - I've just finished rebuilding a 1966 >> triumph spitfire, and I had a '67 split window van (with the mini-pop >> top) back in the day. $5k is my top dollar or i would go for an >> '86-91 model. >> >> The first van is a 1982 diesel with a gas jetta engine from the >> nineties (1.8 or 1.9 liter I believe). I know to look to see if the >> transaxle (or is it a transmission in these?) is from a later model >> cause the diesel ones are geared differently and the 1980-83 >> transaxle aren't very good. Second I will check the compression on >> the engine and look at the plugs to see how worn it is. The >> advantage of this van is that the engine is more powerful and there >> is no smog check (I'm in california - smog checks are a b**ch). They >> want $5k. >> >> The second is a '85, some body dents in front and a few dings, 1.9 >> water cooled engine. Also $5K. It's a westy top and weekender >> inside, which I like (wider bed, dont need the stove - I set up a >> table with a stove when I camp - fridge might be nice). Advantage to >> this one is that he has a second 1.9 engine which he says is in >> running shape. Also, his other car broke down the other day and he's >> using it as a daily driver - which I think indicates some level of >> reliability. >> >> Anything else specific to look for when I look at them? >> >> Thanks all, I appreciate any input. I'm leaning towards the '82 - I >> like the idea of no smog. >> >> Dan >> Los Angeles, CA


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.