Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2011, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:39:59 -0700
Reply-To:     BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Would you buy this salvage title Vanagon?
Comments: To: Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <4da8da7e.8947440a.5e27.48e7@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Guilty as charged. I'm putting this Vanagon back on the street w/o putting in the airbags! ;-)

BenT

sent from my electronic leash

On Apr 15, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> Actually, insurance companies will total at 75% of value. And they usually > use a "worse-case scenario" for repair costs. > > Go to the salvage auctions sometime (IAAI or Copart), you'll see some pretty > nice, late model cars with minor front-end damage. Problem is... the > airbags were deployed, and airbags are expensive! So are the dash covers > that were split open when they deployed. > > This leads to another big problem here in California (elsewhere too, I'm > sure)... people buy these easy-to-fix cars and make them pretty again. Only > problem is that they decide not to replace the airbags. This is really > common here in Sacramento in the "undercover" Russian auto industry. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of

> Roland > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 4:11 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Would you buy this salvage title Vanagon? > > I think it depends completely on how old the car was when it was salvaged.

> Salvage most often means that the cost of the repairs were more than the > value of the vehicle, and the insurance company chooses the lowest cost > option to pay the owner the current fair market value rather than pay for > repairs. > > If a Vanagon was salvaged when it was already 15-20 years old, that is no > big deal. If it is worth $3,500 and the repair estimate was $3,900 then it > is salvaged. If you consider simply repaint costs for a commercial body > shop, then it probably didn't have much damage. > > If a 2008 Mercedes was salvaged, it must have been twisted and contorted > beyond belief. > > The insurance company always makes their repair estimate quite high; > estimates are made from simple inspection, thus they worry a great deal > about the risk of unforeseen problems discovered during the repair process. > > We salvaged 2 cars in the last 3 years (both of them created by my beautiful > offspring). > - Porsche 968 (my other DD besides the Vanagon). Insurance would not repair > it, they offered me about $12,500. I bought it back on salvage for $1,460, > repaired it (mostly cosmetic / light mechanical) for about $3,200 (including > tools), pocketed the rest, and now have a very nice car back to how it was

> (although I know resale will be lower with salvage title). > > - My son's 4 Runner: Insurance offered $6,500, we bought it back for $750, > repaired for about $1,200 and pocketed the rest (I should add it is not back > to before, there are some dents he has to live with). This is basically a

> discard car, so no point in bringing it back to perfect. > > The buyback price is what the insurance company estimates they would get for > the damaged hulk at auction. > > Like Jeffrey said, the process in California is a pain but not hard or > expensive: > go to DMV and start the papers get temp permit, pay $ > then "brake and light test" at a certified shop, > then DMV inspection (not much, does it have a horn and 4 wheels?) > then smog test, > then back to DMV turn in old plates and get new plates. > > Salvaged isn't such a big deal depending on what the buyer can determine > about the vehicle history. We have pictures and all the paper trail so we

> can illustrate to a potential buyer what was wrong during the accident. And > they can thus choose if the "salvageness" is something they care about or > not. > > Roland > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Jeffrey Vickers > <jeff@vickersdesign.com>wrote: > >> BenT >> >> The last time I went through the salvage thing here in CA was many >> years ago with an old Nissan P/U that I had bought from a guy not >> knowing it was salvage (DOH!). >> >> The paperwork was no big deal but the CA inspection was. I had to >> replace all the tail light lenses and one headlight, fix the horn and >> get the headlights adjusted to pass inspection. It was a pain. You >> can't have a single crack in any lens or glass anywhere on the vehicle >> or you will fail. Not a huge expense just more of a PITA. >> >> Jeff in Marin >> On Apr 15, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Automatic digest processor wrote: >> >> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:56:51 -0400 >>> From: Bill Glenn <idahobill@GMAIL.COM> >>> >>> Subject: Re: Would you buy this salvage title Vanagon? >>> >>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:22:45 -0700, BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM> >>> wrote: >>> >>> ...Would you devalue to buy such a thing because of the resulting >>> salvage >>> >>> title... >>> >>> Ben, >>> Rules vary from state to state, but I have encountered the >>> requirement that >>> if repaired rather than scrapped, a vehicle carring a salvage title >>> must be >>> inspected for completeness of repairs to insure road worthiness >>> prior to >>> registration. I have been told that his can be a rather thorough >>> inspection, such that things that could normally be mutually ignored >>> by the >>> seller and buyer of a used car, might have to be repaired (a cracked >>> windshield or a slightly damaged body panel comes to mind). >>> >>> Further, for a vehicle that carries a salvage title, many if not most >>> insurance companies will only offer liability insurance, even if the >>> vehicle has been fully repaired. I think the view is that if the >>> previous >>> damage was sufficent enough to warrant a salvage title, the insurance >>> companies do not want anything to do with possible future repairs, >>> perhaps >>> because repairs could be complicated by the previous repair work. >>> >>> I know you said the vehicle in question has not been in a collision, >>> but an >>> insurance company will likely not being inspecting your van, but >>> will go by >>> what the title says. And that's the very purpose of a salvage >>> title, to >>> put others on notice that some major event has taken place that may >>> well >>> compromise the integrity of the vehicle (think flood-damaged cars >>> being >>> cleaned up and resold to unsuspecting buyers). >>> >>> To save the van you must add value in carrying out the repairs, and >>> a buyer >>> who wishes to insure that value against possible loss will likely >>> pass on >>> the purchase if he cannot do so. >>> >>> For these reasons, a vehicle carrying a salvage title generally >>> appeals to >>> few buyers, and intrinsically carries a lower value as a result. >>> >>> Bill >>> >>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.