Date:         Mon, 9 May 2011 15:56:46 -0500
Reply-To:     Peter Lapp <carrothospital@GOOGLEMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Peter Lapp <carrothospital@GOOGLEMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Likelihood of Windshield breaking on removal?
Comments: To: John Rodgers <inua@charter.net>
In-Reply-To:  <4DC851FD.2020003@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks everyone for the input. I would do it myself, but I figured I would
probably break something when reinstalling and didn't want to risk it. I
didn't ask about the sealer that you mention. I did hear that too and didn't
know if that was an industry standard, or something I needed to make a point
to tell them.

-p


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:43 PM, John Rodgers <inua@charter.net> wrote:

>  There is ALWAYS the risk of breakage - it's a matter of how big the risk.
> A competent shop can probably get it done without breaking - but the RISK of
> breaking is there - so be prepared financially to replace the lass if it
> does. Most shops, even good ones, will play CYA on such repairs.
>
> IIRC, the Bentley says something about using a sealer along with the
> installation. Be sure that gets done. Otherwise - RISK (that word again) of
> leaking after done. Best to get it right the first time.
>
> John
>
> John Rodgers
> Clayartist and Moldmaker
> 88'GL VW Bus Driver
> Chelsea, ALHttp://www.moldhaus.com
>
>
> On 5/9/2011 2:12 PM, Peter Lapp wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently bought a new rubber seal for my windshield and called a few
> places to see how much installation would be. A few told me there's a good
> chance it could break when removed. I don't have any cracks or chips, it's
> in perfect condition. Is it really that likely that it would happen, or do
> they all say that for liability reasons?
> I got quotes anywhere from $60 to $125. I'll most likely go with the cheaper
> option, seeing as I don't see any reason to spent twice the money if there's
> not much to it.
> Any input would be appreciated!
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>