Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2011, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 23 May 2011 13:32:35 -0700
Reply-To:     Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Auto Trans Modified Governor Test Report [addendum]
Comments: To: Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <BANLkTinW7XiiaY3mazgz9HADNw=oRTzhfg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 11:21 -0700, Loren Busch wrote:

> RE: Modified Governor In AT w/Stock VW Engines > So let me ask a very basic question. What makes us think that the > engineers at VW didn't know what they were doing? What makes us > think that the stock match between RPM and tranny gearing is wrong? > And in addition what makes us think the new shift points are better > than what the original designers came up with?

I just got back from German Transaxle and asked Ken whether he felt that there would be any reliability issue moving the shift points up with the modified governor, and he said no.

I asked whether the VW engineers may have picked the stock shift points for solid design reasons, and he said that there were probably many factors. For example, some people live in hilly terrain while others live on the flats. Women (he said women, this may or may not be sexist or may express preference) like lower shift points because they may feel that the sound of the engine revving high can cause concern. Mileage enters into the mix, as does straight up driver preference. He's had some people return the modified governor because they hated the change. Others, like me, love it. Engineering is not the only factor that drives design -- the pesky Marketing department gets their foot into it, too.

Between the time that VW first introduced the 010 transmission (late '70s?) until they discontinued it, they constantly tinkered with the shift points, in the valve body mainly.

The shift points are a matter of compromise between many different needs.

I asked whether he sells the modified governor and how much for one. He said he used to sell them and charged $20, asking for a $50 core deposit. But many people didn't bother returning the core, and stock governors are getting hard to come by. I suggested a $500 core deposit. That, I said, would guarantee that everyone would return their old one.

As mentioned when I posted this addendum earlier today, that there appears to be some weakness in the cooler that mounts to the front of the transaxle that should be attended to if someone wants to try this modification, see my addendum post of earlier today. There may be other unintended consequences, but damage to the transaxle does not seem likely.

> BTW, I understand the need to change the shift point in the auto > tranny if going to a Zetec or Subie engine, whole different power > curves. I also know that the auto tranny in the Vanagons has a > stellar reputation for reliability and endurance when paired with the > stock engines. So why are we trying to re-engineer what has proven to > be a good setup?

I asked that of Ken, too. He said that many things on a car (he used air intake as an example, I'm not sure what he was referring to, but some of you might know) where the general driver might ask, "what's wrong with the way the manufacturer set it up?" and the car enthusiast might want to modify for his or her personal driving habits. "Tuning," he called it.

Musicians know about tuning. Why would someone modify the bridge or nut on a fretted instrument to raise or lower the strings? Didn't the manufacturer get it right?

Near as I could tell from his words and demeanor, this change in the shift point is not trouble for the transaxle. He didn't think this was a big deal. The presence of a brown Vanagon in the GTA parking lot -- and not one stuck in one space but in different locations every time I go over, so it probably belongs to someone who works there -- suggests that he and the crew are not unfamiliar with our vans.

I have a question for those of you who drive a 1.9L manual: at what rpm do you normally upshift when pulling into traffic, or when climbing up a hill? I bet it's higher than 2600 rpm.

-- Rocky J Squirrel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.