Date:         Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:07:46 -0700
Reply-To:     Zeitgeist <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Zeitgeist <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: diesel engines
In-Reply-To:  <63B10365-8472-4B10-999F-EA979ECEB38B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm in the preparations stages of an mTDI (one wire) build for my Bluestar,
so I'll get the best of both approaches; power/efficiency *and* simplicity.
I've owned and maintained at least a dozen or more VW and Mercedes diesels,
and see no downside to them whatsoever.  I prefer the simplicity of manual
injection pumps, so I'm also in the process of building a previously
electronic actuated injection pump 6 cylinder turbodiesel (no wire) swap
into my Mercedes wagon.  I just love the rhythmic sewing machine clatter of
an idling diesel. Some folks are just hardwired as dieselheads.

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Peter K <turbowesty@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had a lot of conversations with other diesel owners at BusFusion
> including TD vs TDI. To sum it up:
>
> If you want great power and speed you go TDI. And accept the added
> complexity that comes with it.
> If you want simple and reliable the you have AAZ written all over you.
> Simpler conversion, simpler to keep on the road. less power, not as fuel
> efficient.
>
> Neither is cheap, and while YMMV you'll still like that improvement.
>
> Regards, Peter Kraiker
> http://studiofstop.com
>
> On 2011-06-17, at 16:25, Mike Miller <mwmiller6@ATT.NET> wrote:
>
> > Van-illas,
> >
> > Please lend a hand if you have an informed [or uninformed but amusing]
> > opinion about the relative merits of TDIs vs AAZ diesels.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
>



--
Casey