Hey there Jim, I appreciate the answer but it feels as though you are lecturing me. Maybe I'm misreading it. On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 07:50 -0700, Jim Arnott wrote:
> Hey Rocky, > > You asked a question and got a precise answer from the manufacturer: "Our > shear bolts are specially made and heat treated for us." He then went > further and gave you the precise specifications for said bolt: "The Rockwell > hardness scale on these bolts ranges from B85-95, with most testing to > B89-90." You then looked up the tensile strength for a steel bolt with a > Rockwell of B85-95. (80-100kpsi) and you found that no standard bolt that > will suffice. This surprises you?
Did I express surprise? As a manufacturer of consumer products for over 25 years I am well aware that off-the-shelf parts often don't meet the specs I'm seeing so we have them made. I was not surprised. What I was hoping to find from the list here is whether the hardness he was able to provide could be translated into bolt grade. Just trying to expand my knowledge a bit, but mainly hoping to get a sense of how special their shear bolt is so I could determine the practicality of using an off-the-shelf part, because if I can't then I have to toss the jack.
> Having worked in aerospace heat-treat for > a few years, I can tell you that if there is an off-the-shelf material that > will do the job, we do not select a different material just so we can > process it. Shear bolts are the fuses of the mechanical world. You want them > to break so other more critical parts don't.
Yup yup yup. I get it, I get it. But sometimes a manufacturer will decide to source everything overseas and the engineering department will write out a full spec for the part for CYA purposes. It might well be that an off-the-shelf part will work, too, but then you don't have as much control over the QC. BTDT.
> > Hardware store bolts? Go to the fastener store. You know the one.... They > will know what you're talking about. Hardware store? They know it's a > "bolt."
Of course. Again, I feel lectured. I was starting at finding simple solutions, such as a suitable bolt being easily found at the local store. It could broaden from there, but let's face it: a new Hi Lift jack is less than $60 so at some point it's not worth it.
> > That being said, It's a 'shear' bolt. The tensile strength is not the only > spec you should be looking at here. > <http://www.ami.ac.uk/courses/topics/0123_mpm/index.html> If you want to > replace it right, use a shear bolt.
Love to. Don't have any more spec than thread size, length, and the hardness of the mfgr's bolt.
> Again, the fastener store may be able to > help. Otherwise, you'll need to contact an aircraft bolt supplier. > <http://www.aircraftspruce.com/menus/ha/bolts.html> as they actually KNOW > the specifications of their hardware.
I expect they do. The question here is whether the Rockwell hardness of the bolt is sufficient information to determine a replacement bolt's specs. Thanks, Jim. Sorry for coming across all testy and disagreeable. I get irritated when I ask a question about a bolt and then my mailbox fills up with people telling me how stupid it is to get under a van supported by only a jack, something I didn't say I was going to do or would ever do. I probably would have been better off just saying that I need to replace a discontinued shear bolt that has a Rockwell hardness of 90, and whether this can be translated into bolt grade. Cripes. Wasn't looking to get upbraided for my question. |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.