Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2011, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:12:14 -0700
Reply-To:     Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Vitrifrigo/Truck Fridge power usage
Comments: To: Karl Mullendore <tdiguru@WESTYVENTURES.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <vanagon%2011092101132890@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hey Karl, thanks for the details of your testing. That helps a lot and now I understand how to interpret your figures. It was the word "average" in the amperage rating you came up with that I was unclear on. I interpreted it to mean that one could expect a 2.1 current draw when the compressor was running on the average, depending on how the thermostat was set and how hot a day it was. Now I understand you're providing the average current draw over a period of time.

I don't see the higher current at the start of the compressor run than a few minutes later, and my ammeter is a good one. Maybe they changed the design or something.

My apologies if you felt like I was accusing you of BS. That was not my intent. I was trying to convey that it was from your site that I got the impression that the compressor drew 2.5A when running, and this led to a lot of confusion here when I installed the thing and found that it drew quite a bit more.

-- Jack "Rocket j Squirrel" Elliott Bend, Ore. 1984 Westfalia. A poor but proud people. 1971 "Ladybug"-brand utility trailer ca. 1972 from a defunct company in San Clemente, Calif., now repurposed as The Westrailia.

Sent from my kitchen.

On 09/20/2011 10:07 PM, Karl Mullendore wrote: > Hey folks, if you don't want to take my independent testing for real, do > your friggin' own test! Would I post BS on my own website? Believe me or > don't believe me, it doesn't matter - but I don't appreciate the snide comments. > > Here are the facts - if they don't fit into your mindset, I don't really > givadamn. :-) > > I tested MY VF C51iAC in mid-summer weather a few years ago. Daytime temps > during the THREE-DAY test were 80-85 F. night time temps at 65-70 F. The > thermostat was set on the notch clockwise past vertical. I connected a 12V > analog clock to the fridge fan wires, so that the clock would accurately > measure the full time the fridge was running. The clock ran exactly 24 hours > in a 72-hour period. With me so far? OK. I then connected a very accurate > amp gauge between the fridge power lead and the power supply. On startup, > the fridge would vary from 2.8-3.0 amps. As it ran, the amperage would > slowly drop as low as 2.2. Since the run time far outweighs the startup > time, I figure the average amp draw to be very close to what VF was claiming > at the time, 2.5. OK - 2.5 multiplied by 8 hours run time per day = 20 > amp-hours. > > Karl > www.westyventures.com > > >>>> So where did I get the idea that the VF draws about the same as the >>>> Norcold (which I measured at around 2.5 to 2.8 A?) >>>> >>>> MULLENDORE! >>>> >>>> From<http://www.westyventures.com/parts.html> : "...the fridge >>>> operates on 12 or 24 volts ... Current draw on 12 volt is 2.5 amps >>>> (average) with an average daily usage of 22 amp-hours." >>> >>> Don't compare apples and oranges (running current vs. average current). >>> From the same datasheet I linked, the Vitrifrigo is spec'd at 470 Watts >>> average daily consumption. Now, Watts are power, not energy, so they're >>> clearly confused about units. But I'd guess they're really talking about >>> Watt-hours, which would equate to about a 1.6 Amp average draw (~54% >>> duty cycle, which over 24 hours would be ~38 Amp-hours). >>> >>> No idea what westyventures is talking about, a 2.5 A average draw over >>> 24 hours would be 60 Amp-hours??? Maybe they mean 2.5 A _nominal_, i.e. >>> the typical draw when the compressor is running? If it really uses only >>> 22 Amp-hours typical per day, then perhaps it has much better >>> insulation/more efficient compressor and a much lower duty cycle? ...or >>> maybe it's all marketing BS. I doubt a Norcold is twice as efficient as >>> a Vitrifrigo (or 50% worse?), as the numbers imply. >> >> It's all very confusing. >> >> Someone on the list needs to put a Norcold and a Vitrofrigo in an oven, >> say, 80 degrees F, and let them run for 24 hours after adjusting their >> respective thermostats to achieve the same cabinet temp. >> >> I need a grant. With that I can buy the reefers, the white lab coat, the >> clip board, the test equipment, the big oven, and a blonde lab assistant. >> >> -- RJS


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.