Date:         Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:38:04 -0400
Reply-To:     Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
Subject:      Re: New tires
Comments: To: Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@Q.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <6C52E05FF1F8487A85E2F91D0BB2C87D@KarlPC>
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII

The stock tire was a REINFORCED tire. It's not about the size, its about the load rating.

On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Karl Wolz wrote:

> Dennis,
>
> Do I understand correctly that you're saying the stock tire size for the
> Vanagon is not adequate for the standard load?  Something doesn't sound
> right there.
>
> Karl Wolz
>
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]
> |On Behalf Of Dennis Haynes
> |Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 6:12 AM
> |To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> |Subject: Re: New tires
> |
> |I wasn't able to locate the load-inflation table for that
> |specific tire but that size regardless of the C or D rating is
> |only good for about 1,200 pounds at 40 psi.