Vanagon EuroVan
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (October 2011, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:00:27 -0400
Reply-To:     Michael Snow <slowmachine82@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Michael Snow <slowmachine82@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Engine Conversion Idea...
In-Reply-To:  <1318780733.52220.YahooMailRC@web180314.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

A few years ago (OK, probably ten) I met a guy that worked in a California race car fabrication shop. He had a 1983 diesel passenger van with a Mazda rotary engine, installed using parts that he fabbed and the diesel 5-speed transmission. I never saw the van with the engine installed, but related stories about passing cars going uphill in the SoCal mountains, engine revving well over 10,000 RPM, with a giant smile on his face. The engine was removed to install in another car, and he was selling the van. Part of the van modification was a raised engine cover (plywood lined with noise-reducing foam) that must have been eight inches taller than the flush-fitting stock cover.

Mike

On 10/16/2011 11:58 AM, Evan Mac Donald wrote: > All right. I have been thinking of off-beat, kind of "cool" engines to > replace the not-all-it-could-be waterboxer, and one I keep coming back to is a > Wankel 2-rotor, from Mazda. The later ones were fuel injected, so no carb > worries, and I figure the high RPM needs of the engine could be met by putting > it together with a Deisel gearbox, and its 4.86 or even 5.11 (or so) final > drive. It is low on torque, which is an obvious bad point, but if you let it > rev, which it surely can, it should be quite happy at 5500or so RPM on the > highway at cruise. Lots happier than our regular engines would be at thier > regular cruise RPM of 3600 to 4000.... > > Anybody wanna poke holes in this (ok, crazy) theory? > Evan Mac Donald > > > "...in the absence of facts, myth rushes in, the kudzu of history." > -Stacy Schiff


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.