Date:         Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:02:00 -0500
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Rear Shocks, Syncro vs. 2wd
Comments: To: Mike <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

The shock is the power suspension stop. The Syncro shocks are longer. This
increased travel means that when the wheel drops the axle shafts now get
over extended and the rear springs can become loose and pop out. Keep to the
smooth roads.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
Mike
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:51 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: Rear Shocks, syncro vs 2wd

I installed syncro rear shocks on my 2WD '84 Vanagon, and never had a single
problem of any kind after years of use.
He may want them in this case for the increased range of travel.

Mike B.

-----Original Message-----
From: craig cowan
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 11:28 AM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Rear Shocks, syncro vs 2wd

A member of our Pittsburgh Vanagon club needs new rear shocks. He knows he
has some kind of lift springs and believes now that they are syncro rear
springs. He purchased 2wd factory shocks but is now concerned that syncro
shocks are what he needs and that they're different.

Any thoughts?

Thanks.

-Craig
'87 SUNROOF Synco Westy Zetec
'90 GL "New Bus"
'85 GL about to head to pasture


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4672 - Release Date: 12/10/11