Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2012, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:18:19 +0000
Reply-To:     Jamie Fitterer <fittdog8848@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jamie Fitterer <fittdog8848@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Oil in Coolant
Comments: To: finnrunyon@gmail.com
In-Reply-To:  <CANLfs5H7k2jocgSYkDKkmu06iW=vetpP-u+0kW1O1v5E-c2nPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Have you verfied your speed with a GPS unit in both vehicles? I would look a t the speedo and tire size like some have pointed out.

> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:59:24 -0700 > From: finnrunyon@GMAIL.COM > Subject: Oil in Coolant > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Thanks in advance for your ongoing support of this issue. Those who have > been following this issue may remember that I moved from NJ to Taos, NM > last summer. I purchased a second Westfalia upon our arrival out here > because our 87 has serious rust. The 87 is an automatic, the 89 a 4 speed > with positraction and Rhein 15" wheels. Several questions, Now that there > is no further migration of oil into the coolant since I changed the oil > cooler, I am trying to get a feel for the performance of this engine. At > 7000 feet here in Taos, I believe that the hp loss is around 21%, vs my 87 > automatic at sea level. I imagine that the 89 also feels a bit slower due > to the 15" wheels, but I can't directly compare the two as the 87's front > end is apart. Is there anyone listening that is at a similar altitude. I > would have no problem getting to say 75 mph at sea level in the 87. If > feels as though 75 in the 89 is unreachable? Where I am going with this is > wondering if the overheat that the previous owner did damaged something > else? > > My second issue is at start up. The bus will start and idle pretty > smoothly if I let warm up a bit. If I start it and try to move without > letting it warm up fully it stalls and is cranky to get going again without > some throttle input. Once it is warm, it runs pretty smoothly. Is there > something I should be looking into for start up. I don't remember the > choke situation, but it acts as if the fuel injection is not compensating > for a cold start? > > Thanks, > Finn


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.