Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2012, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 May 2012 22:57:22 -0500
Reply-To:     Tom Hargrave <thargrav@HIWAAY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Tom Hargrave <thargrav@HIWAAY.NET>
Subject:      Re: Smart car opinions
Comments: To: Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <4FA49ED7.2070501@turbovans.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Remember the Chevy Sprint? The 3 cylinder Suzuki sold by Chevrolet?

I worked for Dominos when they came out and a lot of drivers bought them as delivery cars. I don't think any of the clutches lasted past 30,000 miles and none of the Sprints made the 100,000 mile mark.

Then years before was the Chevy Cavalier, came out in 82 I think and we had some of the earlier ones. We ran a whole fleet of these cars as delivery vehicles. The bodies, engines & transmissions would easily go past 200,000 miles but the shifter plate had a bad habit of shearing off. The plate was tacked in with three welds - the single weld would sheer then the other two would flex until they broke. We would re-weld it in place and the Cavalier would go another 50,000 or so before someone would shear the shifter plate off again.

Thanks, Tom Hargrave www.stir-plate.com www.towercooler.com www.kegkits.com www.grow-sun.com

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Scott Daniel - Turbovans Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:31 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Smart car opinions

I have driven a Canadian model, the turbo diesel . They sure are cute. That was in about 2007 .. hardly any had ever been seen here . People would stop, point, gawk, etc.

under-powered.. lurchy semi-automatic transmission.

also what I would call very likely a much better new car than a used one.

I have always noticed, that on cars with tiny engines .. Americans drive the snot out of them to get them to get going .. by the time one of these has say 80,000 miles on it, I'll bet it'll be pretty tired.. engine wise , perhaps transmission wise too.

If Consumer Reports has a data on it ....good idea to see what they say.. A+ for cuteness though !

scott turbovans.com

On 5/4/2012 12:38 AM, Karl Wolz wrote: > Now that it's Friday, does anyone on list have any experience, good, > bad, or otherwise, with Samrt cars? Going up to look at one tomorrow. > > Karl Wolz > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 2411/4978 - Release Date: 05/04/12


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.