Date:         Thu, 10 May 2012 14:08:30 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Engine: To Replace or Not To Replace. 85 Vanagon
Comments: To: Jon Durham <jon_durham@KNOLOGY.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <4FABBA90.40503@knology.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

The engines condition really needs to be evaluated. At that mileage it may
be worn but it is also thoroughly tested. Also what is the condition of all
the support systems? A blown radiator can leave that new engine is even
worse shape than the old one! The 1.9s tend to have main bearing issues
requiring the case to be align bored but can still go the distance. Do the
evaluation and find out if the power issue is real and if it is really the
engine. Maybe it only needs a valve job.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
Jon Durham
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:55 AM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Engine: To Replace or Not To Replace. 85 Vanagon

My engine's got just over 200,000 miles. As I mentioned earlier, seems as
though she has gradually lost power the last few years.

In terms of miles, what's the life expectancy of a 1.9L? Is there much power
difference between a 1.9L and a 2.1L?

I'm thinking why not just replace the engine now rather than waiting til she
blows which could be tomorrow or 3 years years from now.

What are peoples' opinions?

Jon
--
"Until one has loved an animal, a part of one's soul remains unawakened."
Anatole France