Date:         Fri, 25 May 2012 19:48:08 -0500
Reply-To:     JRodgers <jrodgers113@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         JRodgers <jrodgers113@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Automatic vs Manual
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I have three vans - one automatic, and two manual tranny models. The
automatic I have never driven. It is a 1991 Carat and a project van.
Basically sound, but needs some work - needs a few things like rear
bumper, new disc calipers, pads and rotors, some electrical work-right
hand passenger door electrical is fouled, front blower is bad, AC
operational, but no refrigerant.  Even so - this van is sweet. All
electric doors and windows, body and paint good, built-in fold out
table, factory jump seats, etc. Engine is very good, recent fuel
injection work over.  But tranny is really iffy. But as I said - I have
never driven it.

I have the two manual tranny vans - both '88 GL's and in relatively good
shape.  I am considering letting one of these three go.

I am strongly inclined to sell one '88 GL and finish the restoration on
the Carat. A key point for me in this decision is going to revolve
around the manual vs the automatic transmission.  Somewhere down the
road I might like to do an upgrade to a later engine and also do
something special with the tranny.

So - I defer to the List for it's wisdom regarding manual vs automatics.
Which would be the better choice in the long haul just based on the
performance of the transmissions.

Thanks,

John in Birmingham, AL