Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2012, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 26 May 2012 12:21:02 -0400
Reply-To:     "Chris S." <szpejankowski@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Chris S." <szpejankowski@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Automatic vs Manual
Comments: To: Loren Busch <starwagen@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <CAH32RNZjmdb7dmYcbBys3-2wkhaoXbk+t3E7wL_46CbYNFGn4g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Most problems with an automatic are fixed by replacing them with a manual. Most problems with a manual are fixed by replacing the driver.

I have been driving manual Vanagons for 12 years with none of the problems you mentioned.

Chris.

Wysłane z iPhone'a

Dnia May 26, 2012 o godz. 11:01 Loren Busch <starwagen@GMAIL.COM> napisał(a):

> RE: Auto vs Stick and Gas Milage > I've seen some comments in this thread on gas mileage with an automatic > that puzzle me based on my personal experience. I drove an '85 Westy stick > for about seven years, many long trips, about 60 k miles. During that time > it cost me a tranny rebuild, two clutches, slave cylinder and eventually an > engine. (Though the engine replacement had noting to do with the type of > tranny I was driving.) That '85 Westy, on the highway, gave 18 to 21 MPG > depending on how I drove. For the last ten years I've been driving a '90 > Westy with automatic. Not a cent spent on clutches or tranny except for > routine service. Just over 70K miles now, many long trips. And I get from > 17 to 20 MPG, again depending on how and where I'm driving. The automatic

> in town? 13 to 15 MPG. BUT my left knee remains intact after driving in > heavy city traffic! Note the numbers, just a mile per gallon less with > the automatic based on real world experience with two Westies and driven > with virtually identical loads and several times a year the identical trip. > On the highway/freeway this is driving at around 60 MPH or a little less. > If I run at 65 or higher then milaege will drop to 16 to 17 MPG. And the > best mileage I get is usually on driving segments in the mountains, winding > and twisty up and down roads. Go figure on that. BTW, I'm at just under > 170,000 miles on this original tranny and the original 2.1L WBX. That > means that both are going to need serious attention in the near future. > The tranny will cost me half to a third of the cost of a rebuild on a > manual.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.