Date:         Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:44:49 -0700
Reply-To:     Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Tips on passing emissions
Comments: To: mcneely4@cox.net
In-Reply-To:  <20120629122755.BRNW7.289369.imail@eastrmwml108>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Right, but by that logic the funnel should have been used on all vehicles to be equal conditions since it caused some degree of backpressure.  I'm sure many more would not pass in those days if they did.

Stuart

> most important, is that he was able to talk the tester out of using 
>the  funnel they were supposed to stick on the wand for short tailpipes 

>like the  Vanagon's.  I think that had the most to do with it because 
>without it there  was more air dilution of the exhaust gasses.  That 
>stupid funnel kept the  gasses in the tailpipe longer, and I didn't 
>think it was fair.  They didn't  listen to me though.

Well, the test conditions are set to be constant for all vehicles.  One is not testing against the ideal, but against the conditions of the test.  If what is supposed to be a constant is varied, then the result will not yield the desired information -- whether the vehicle is operating properly as required.  mcneely