Date:         Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:18:04 -0600
Reply-To:     OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@COMCAST.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@COMCAST.NET>
Subject:      Re: EPA and Vanagon Emissions
Comments: To: Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <4FED3153.50106@turbovans.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

        I'm not a chemist so I'm not sure how this applies but keep in mind
that the "Fuel" that we burn in our ICEs is not

just Gasoline, it is a mixture of Air & Gasoline which under ideal
conditions is 14.7 to 1, so for every 1lb of Gasoline there

would also 14.7lbs of Air bring burned.

        The term Air-Fuel Mixture has always bugged me ~ should be Air-
Gasoline Mixture.

                                                        ORR ~ DeanB


On 28 Jun , 2012, at 10:38 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote:

> On 6/28/2012 9:07 PM, Tom Hargrave wrote:
>> 2.3 kg of carbon per liter burned
>
> 2.3 kg is  roughly 5.06 pounds
> Something is missing or not stated right as it does not seem that
> there
> are 5 lbs of carbon in one liter of fuel.
> if gas weighs around 6 lbs per gal .
> that means a liter of gas weights around 1.5 lbs.
> pretty hard to get 5 lbs of carbon out of 1.5 lbs of gasoline I'd
> think.
>
> what pollutes more ..?
> a 7 liter engine with an idle emissions figure of 1.0 % CO,
> or a 1 liter engine with that same emissions spec at idle ?
>
> Europeans measure in grams of whatever pollutant, CO2 say, per
> distance
> traveled, say grams per mile. .  Not as a percentage. That makes sense
> to me.