Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2012, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:02:56 -0700
Reply-To:     Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Kens trip more comments
Comments: To: Harold Teer <teer.vanagon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CAGwfHKTsKx5JokncmjDvfn2E3QBU0n8tS08XL=GifhZV639W9w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Austin, Nv. on Hwy 50 has one, too..."The Loneliest Road".....As you come into the town from the east side you are coming down a pass and the main street/highway is still quite steep after the final switchback outside town.. Right on some building's wall there is a big sign painted...."Slow down! Speed trap ahead"....and they aren't kidding..... Don Hanson

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Harold Teer <teer.vanagon@gmail.com>wrote:

> Ken, > > You are not alone in being caught in the Del Norte speed trap. Dove Creek > on the same highway was notorious for doing the same thing years ago when I > lived in Durango, CO. > > See: http://www.speedtrap.org/city/1434/Del%20Norte > > Harold > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ken Wilford <kenwilfy@comcast.net> > wrote: > > > One other comment on our trip and something that I think would benefit > > Westy drivers. We made a point to drive on scenic highways whenever we > > could. If you look on most maps you will see some highways that have > > dots next to them and if you look close you will see that this > > considered a scenic road. I would highly recommend following these > > routes versus the interstate. Interstates were actually originally made > > to transport our troops from their bases around the US to points where > > foreign countries were likely to attack us. They were made for speed > > and not for necessarily for the scenery. However scenic highways were > > actually made for the scenery and therefore you can not only drive from > > point A to point B but also enjoy doing it. The hours will fly by as > > you "ooo and ahh" at the natural wonders around you. You will see > > scenic pull off every so often. Take as many of them as you can without > > getting too crazy. You don't have to stop at every single one but if > > something catches your attention, stop and check it out. We loved doing > > this and it breaks up the driving. You can stop, go to the bathroom, > > eat lunch, and check out something cool all at the same time! > > > > The scenic highways I really liked was 101 starting at the top of Oregon > > and going down to northern California. You will drive on the edges of > > cliffs overlooking the crashing ocean waves in Oregon. Check out cool > > stuff like "The Devil's punchbowl", etc. I would also recommend taking > > 160 across the bottom of Utah and Colorado. Monument Valley, Mesa Verde, > > San Juan National Forest, etc. These roads usually don't have many big > > rigs on them so you won't feel as run off the road either. > > > > One other thing to be careful of if you are taking the road less > > traveled by is speed traps. We ran into one of these on 160 in Colorado > > at a small town called Del Norte. It is right after you coast down a > > really long mountain grade where the speed limit is 65 mph. You have to > > keep on the brakes the whole way down to stop going too fast, then when > > you get to the town the speed limit goes from 65 to 40 to 35 without any > > real warning and very quickly (like in the course of a quarter of a > > mile). So if you don't slam on your brakes when you come into town, > > chances are you are going to be coasting through at around 50 like I was > > and get stopped and get a ticket. You have to watch and obey the speed > > limits especially in small towns. Our ticket for going 50 in a 40 was > > $125. That is alot in my opinion plus 2 points on your license. I > > thought the guy might take mercy on us since my record is basically > > perfect, but he didn't. > > > > Hope this helps someone. > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Ken Wilford > > John 3:16 > > www.vanagain.com > > Phone: 856-327-4936 > > Fax: 856-327-2242 > > > > > > On 10/17/2012 11:12 AM, Steven Johnson wrote: > > > >> Dennis H. has warned about over-loading campers for years. Common > >> mistake for most vehicles. Then drivers expect their > >> shocks, brakes and steering to save them when they take corners too fast > >> or > >> cannot stop in time. People expect way too much > >> of physics.... > >> > >> Steven J. > >> 91 Westy > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:58 AM, David Bjorkman <ddbjorkman@verizon.net > >> >wrote: > >> > >> I have to agree with Ken. When I took my roadtrip this past June, > with > >>> a new inline 4 from FAS, I packed to the gills. About 5000 lbs, and > the > >>> max is 5500. I should have left most of those canned goods home and > went > >>> shopping more. Weight absolutely makes a major difference in > >>> performance, > >>> as does altitude. > >>> > >>> Dave B. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10/16/12, kenneth wilford (Van-Again)<kenwilfy@COMCAST.**NET< > kenwilfy@COMCAST.NET>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> We actually sold an 88 Westy that we had for several years, and then > used > >>> the money to buy a 34ft 95 Fleetwood Bounder motor home. This is > because > >>> we have four kids that are medium sized and we were going on a month > long > >>> trip. I knew that there was no way we could fit all of our stuff and > six > >>> people into a Westy camper and not try to kill each other over the > course > >>> of a month. We needed some elbow room and the Bounder gave us that. It > >>> wasn't the biggest, baddest MH out there as at has no slide outs, and > >>> wasnt > >>> the size of a tour bus. Actually Dennis Haynes recommended for me to > get > >>> the Class A motor home and I followed his advice. I used our Vanagon > >>> camper for shorter trips that were just my wife and I. If I were doing > >>> this trip in the future with just the two of us I think we would be > fine > >>> in > >>> a Westy. However because we had the extra people, we needed the extra > >>> room. > >>> > >>> As far as taking those mountains in a Westy is concerned, I can chime > in > >>> because I have done a similar trip to this one in a Westy with three > >>> people. The biggest problem most westy owners have is treating their > >>> Westy > >>> like a much larger RV. They want to take all of their toys along and > also > >>> max it out on people. I have customers coming in here that want me to > >>> install center two person bench seats in their Westy so they can seat > >>> six. > >>> They load every single cabinet up with stuff and then put stuff on the > >>> top > >>> on racks, and then tow a trailer behind. This isn't a very good plan. > If > >>> you are going to take a nice trip in your van, less is more. You need > to > >>> evaluate exactly what you need and then try to take the bare minimum of > >>> that. You want your Westy to be safe and part of that is being below > the > >>> Max Gross Vehicle Weight. Most Westy owners never look at that sticker, > >>> they never think of it, but if they ever actually weighed their vans > >>> fully > >>> loaded they would be pretty shocked. I have had them come in here > loaded > >>> down to the point that you can actually see the van sagging down under > >>> the > >>> weight, packed full to the point were there is only enough room inside > to > >>> sit but not actually move around. > >>> > >>> So don't overload your Westy, I would say four people is the max I > would > >>> take on a trip longer than a few hours or one or two overnights, and > you > >>> will enjoy your van much more. Maxing it out is going to make it that > >>> much > >>> slower, and wear out that much faster. You could even have problems > >>> stopping going down the long downhills that always follow the long up > >>> hills. Read the owners manual, believe what is says, follow it, and you > >>> should have a better experience. Just my two cents. > >>> > >>> Ken Wilford > >>> John 3:16 > >>> www.vanagain.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> ----- > >> No virus found in this message. > >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > >> Version: 2013.0.2741 / Virus Database: 2614/5836 - Release Date: > 10/16/12 > >> > >> > >> > > > -- > __________ > Harold Teer > 1991 Westy > Harrisonburg, VA >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.