Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2013, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:04:26 -0800
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Does this look like a fuel leak?
Comments: To: OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@COMCAST.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <08875342-C3C6-46BA-80B7-700FDEA96DFB@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi ... they must have made that vanagon on a bad day then.

The only place I seeproblems is where the hose clamps are. As I've said ..the original crimp type don't work very well after a long time. ( espeically on that 'one spot' forward of the firewall fitting ...thosejust loveto leak )

also ..cheap american small hose clamps that cut into the hose . just one way or another.. it's where the hose clamps go ..on the ends of the hoses.

I just keep a close eye on all those.. and any original hose clamps are automatically on a list of things to do - cut 'em off.. replace with a good clamp , I use german screw clamps..

and the 'real' fuel injection screw type clamp is a band style camp with a screw.

I like those over any crimp type clamp because you can check tightness.. retighten the clamp some if you need to . and take things apart and put them back together with the same clamp.

Just running and engine and not *driving* the van is pretty rough on things in my mind. I hope you at least made sure the clutch disc wasn't rusted to the flywheel.. it's much better for everything ..clutch , transmission , brakes etc... if you drive it .. and even then ....not getting much use is just rough on them. Like even driving one say 2 hours a month .. it still goes downhill with that little use over time.

maybe the fuel hoses are like a wooden boat .. they have to be exposed to the fluids they were made to be in contact with in order to remain healthy and sealing well.

I think the air pillars/chimneys in the rear are a brillinant design and serve a very useful purpose.. if nothing else they take in engine air for it to run on up off the ground, and not down by wheels where there could be a lot more dust. Perhaps heat-triggered doors that slam shut in the case of a fire ..... but I sure wouldn't block those off myself.

flowing air is a good thing in an engine compartment, at least a decent amount, not that thebottom isn't pretty much open anyway

On 2/1/2013 9:57 AM, OlRivrRat wrote: > Scott & TWIMC > > I can tell you for a fact & from experience that OE Vanagon > FuelHoses > do deteriorate & LeakLikeASieve ~ Quite literally ~ > > Back in 1983 I bought what I was told @ the time was NMs very 1st > H2OBoxerWesty. Over the next several years I proceed to > > put 92K mi's on it & then parked it ( when a FamilyDecision was made > to get a more powerful van that was capable of pulling > > of pulling a HorseTrailer ). The Westy didn't budge for a bunch of > years but I did start it & allow to run for 1/2-1hr every month > > or 2. Now I don't really remember how many years that scenario > continued but on one of those occasions I went to check on it > > by looking out a window where I had a view of its full profile & saw > fluid pouring out of it near the back of the engine bay so I > > rushed out & shut it down. I was in middle of something @ the time & > very dismayed about what had just occurred so I did not > > look into what the fluid was 'til the following day @ which time I > pulled the EngineBayCover & much to my surprise, didn't find > > anything obviously wrong ~ I had it in my head for some reason that > the RearMainSeal had gone & I would find oil all over the > > back end of the EngineBay. So I started it up & went back to have a > look & was shocked to find a VanagonFuelHose rendition of > > a LasVegas fountain display ~ needless to say I very quickly ran back > & shut it down. The rubber in the hoses on both sides of > > the PressureReg' had deteriorated & only the woven sleeve was keeping > it all together & acting like a sieve. > > One other point I'd like to make about VanagonEngineFires ~ I have > spent time pondering why they seem to do so much > > destruction & have come to the conclusion that it may be due to the > fact that VW provided them with ~ Chimneys ~ DPillars ~ > > so one item that I have thought about having on hand in addition to > FireExtinguishers is something to quickly cover the DPVents > > to try to prevent TheFanningOfTheFlames ~ or possibly just plugging up > the DPillars ~ are they really necessary on an H2OBoxer ~ > > ORR ~ DeanB > On 31 Jan , 2013, at 4:32 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote: > >> Hi John, >> that's why I said the safest default thing to do is not drive one when >> there is a sniff of fuel. >> >> and ..this may drive people nuts .. >> I basally don't ever see original fuel hoses leaking on vanagons ... >> I own 9 ..I have 4 more here at least that are running. >> I keep an eye on things for sure.. >> and I do remove the original crimp clamps for sure ... >> those do eventually leak. >> I always eliminate the firewall fitting weakness - that one is >> *Mandatory*. >> And of course if I see anything fuel-hose wise that is weak or >> funky, I >> fix it, you betcha. >> >> heck .I think people introduce problems they wouldn't have had by >> using >> less than OE quality hoses. >> >> I have never seen a leaking fuel rail yet. >> I have no kidding ...about 20 on vans and at least that many in boxes >> ..amazing plastic ..sure wish all plastic things were that tough. >> I know people that let their vans get all rusty have the metal ends >> rust >> sometimes.. >> I just don't have that issue ever. >> >> Oddly ..I have watched a waterboxer engine running .. >> when there was no hose clamp of any kind of one of the fuel rail >> connections ! >> and it wasn't leaking there either. >> Iput a good clamp on of course. >> >> I would say 'not looking' is what leads to problems. >> I think, like you do .....one should be nosing around the engine >> compartment on a regular basis ..like for any excuse. >> Like get in there and carefully eyeball each and every tiny part, >> wire, >> hose etc. >> With emphacis on fuel hoses and clamps of course .. >> but even more, in my world ....'corrosion'. >> People freak out when I say spary the entire engine down with WD-40 ( >> except in the alternator ) but having done that to thousandsof cars >> over >> a period of many decades .....it's a hellava lot better than things >> rusting and corroding. >> I have vanagon parts .. >> including aluminum ones that are corroded to just dust. Point >> is ..it's >> not hard to preventand treat. >> >> The waterboxer hose layout is pretty sweet all right. I have no >> criticisms of it really .. >> except for the dorky firewall fuel fitting .. >> a part with no purpose at all. And ..that 'one spot' is hard to get >> at >> and see., right above the starter there. >> And it likes to leak there. >> >> like the old saying ..a chain is only as strong as its weakest link .. >> if a vanagon's engine compartment fuel hoses and clamps are all >> perfect .. >> there still some hoses forward of the firewall and above the >> transand if >> it's original there...all the new hoses on the engine in the world >> won't >> help. >> >> glad you are checking things on a regular basis ! >> not doing that is what causes vanagons to have problems. >> >> scott >> >> On 1/31/2013 2:46 PM, JRodgers wrote: >>> Scott, >>> >>> I think that over-paranoia is fully justified. I've never owned >>> another >>> vehicle that was as fuel-leak prone as the Vanagon - even with new >>> hoses >>> and clamps. I check my hoses for seeps, leaks, loose clamps, fittings >>> and wear once a month and any time I have the engine hatch open. >>> >>> BTW - I can't think of a vehicle on which the fuel system >>> inspection is >>> any easier that the stock Vanagon. >>> >>> John R >>> >>> On 1/31/2013 3:08 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote: >>>> I think people are a little over-paranoid about fuel leaks >>>> sometimes ... >>> >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.