Date:         Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:09:43 -0800
Reply-To:     Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: 1991 digital clock
Comments: To: Larry Alofs <lalofs@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <CA+r=JhpmTHG0d9U4RHpSDcL8Q4Ab2C6aBQK-iPk7nXccmFOZgg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

It is low, but not unusual if measured off the cigarette lighter in our rigs
with all the old connections.  Best to measure voltage right at the battery,
where it should be at least 14v (with engine running of course). If less,
your alternator isn't up to snuff for the work it's being asked to do.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
Larry Alofs
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 1:02 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: 1991 digital clock

Always nice to have a SNZ function when you"re driving.  11.7 volts seems
kinda low tho.  Just saying...

Larry A.


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:22 PM, ANTONY MARSH <apetermarsh@me.com> wrote:

> For your info,
>
> Would this be too modern for my 91?  I mean, kinda hi-tek right?
>
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-LCD-Digital-Car-Vehicle-Voltmeter-Thermome
> ter-Monitor-Calendar-Clock-/160926499744
> ?
>
> Keep smiling
>
> Peter Marsh