Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2013, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:21:20 -0600
Reply-To:     ralph meyermann <ralphmeyermann@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         ralph meyermann <ralphmeyermann@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Diesel good idea?
Comments: To: Eric Caron <ecaron1@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:  <540CEC0E-C5A2-4273-AF7B-7C280DEED198@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The only issues Ive had with Velma is alt belt burning up switched to a single belt set up from Scott, other than that it was due to the p o ignorance and no know how. Definitely need more power and a gasser tranny! Currently I'm adding a turbo set up on mine low boost and saving for a 1.9 AAZ or 1z ahu.

Velma 82 na diesel westy On Jun 1, 2013 11:56 AM, "Eric Caron" <ecaron1@comcast.net> wrote:

> Listers, > > My mistake! The diesel is a 82. Many people have written to me > with info and recommendations concerning the diesel. I'm very grateful. > It sounds like I do need to pass on this clean sounding camper because of > safety for my drivers. Reading all these adds and keeping it all straight > is starting to make my head spin! > > I do feel like I'm beginning to narrow my search though. Luckily though I > never considered shipping a camper I now think that is a reasonable option. > this opens up the search area considerably. > > I was also lurking on the Eurovan list for ideas but it really feels to me > that I need to return to my old friend a 84 and later vanagon Westfailia. > That should do it for my mid life crisis! > Please keep the great sightings and adds coming! > > > Eric Caron > > On Jun 1, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > In stock form the US vanagon Diesels were only 48 horsepower. Power to > > weight and frontal surface area this is worse than the 67 and earlier > buses. > > When the vehicles were built the national was 55 mph. These days you > really > > need to be able to do 65-70 to travel comfortably on the interstates. > Even > > then you can get pushed around. When pushed to the limits these engines > do > > blow head gaskets and crack heads. The low mileage can be a warning sign. > > Why wasn't it used? When a vehicle like this is put to regular use age > > instead of mileage will become a problem. A lot of the rubber, plastic, > and > > hydraulic parts will fail. Unless you really want this vehicle and/or > plan > > on upgrading it I would keep looking. > > > > Dennis > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.