Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2013, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:53:29 -0500
Reply-To:     Tom Hargrave <thargrav@HIWAAY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Tom Hargrave <thargrav@HIWAAY.NET>
Subject:      Re: How bad is it to have dual carbs instaed if the FI on an 84
Comments: To: David <fjazzbass@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <CAGbP_PiWZHzrS=0Jn=BCJyfSsSmt+RzpK384+abcFN9dAWYBVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Gasoline wash down is real - it's caused by gasoline condensing on cold cylinder walls during cold start-up. It can be a real problem on carbureted engines with chokes because the gas droplets from a choked engine can be huge. A FI system properly atomizes gas even during a cold start.

Gasoline wash down killed carbureted engines that were started, driven less than 5 miles then shut down & did not have much effect on engines with properly set chokes that were driven long enough to warm up. It would be so bad in some of these short run cars that you could smell gas on the dip stick.

American cars of the 70's did not appear to go 100,000 miles because the 70's was the era of widespread odometer roll-backs. A car would come into the dealership and the shop would set the odometer to the condition of the interior after clean-up. Many American cars were rolled back 30K, 40K or even 50K miles and some were rolled back more than once. The best trade-in's were salesman's cars. They would trade in cheap with 100,000 or more miles with little interior wear & would appear back on the lot or sell through auction with 30K - 40K on the odometer.

Thanks, Tom Hargrave www.kegkits.com www.stir-plate.com www.towercooler.com www.grow-sun.com www.raspberryproject.com

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of David Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:51 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: How bad is it to have dual carbs instaed if the FI on an 84

I've watched this thread for the past couple days and seen some great responses.

I did, however, want to remind us of a discussion that I thought was brought up by Dennis several years back about the wear difference on an engine with carbs vs fuel injection.

>From what I remember, it was seen as a better thing for FI based on the idea that the full WASH of fuel on the cylinder walls on startup wasn't washing away the protective coating of oil on the cylinders.

I'm remembering my old carbureted vehicles and how the engines seemed to be worn out with even less than 100k miles...burning through lots of oil...having to use thicker oils, smoke out the tailpipe etc. Although these were American cars bought in the 70's (a dark time for the US auto market).

Maybe the archives would pull up that discussion...

Dave 85 GL Baby Bus (that when head gaskets were done @ 145k miles the decision was made that the wear didn't necessitate new rings or rebuild...)

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:48 AM, A J <flavanagon@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all, > I am looking at a van it is an 83 or maybe an 84 but it is water > cooled,and it seems to have been converted to dual carbs from the fuel > injection. Im not sure if such was available factory so I am wondering > if I am going to be in for a bunch of hassles? It doesnt looked > butchered or anything but it is weird to open the hatch and look at > dual carbs with little individual air filters and a connecting rod > connected from the accelerator linkage to a long pivit rod that > connects both carbs. Im not positive but it kind of looks like a dual > carb setup that would be on an aircooled. > With just a quick look around it seems like some of the wiring and "boxes" > that are on my 87 arent on this at all. Was told it did run fine but > has been sitting. Am I asking for a whole big bag of troubles if I do > go on and buy this van? > I personally wouldnt have a concern about the carbs other than would > they be more of a hassle and is there a power loss/increase. Can > anyone enlighten me with the pros and cons with this setup? Im > thinking without the electronics all over the engine it may be a more > reliable,less costly motor to care for but Im just guessing. Any input/opinions appreciated. > > Thanks, > > A J >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.