Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:36:50 -0400
Reply-To: Mike B <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Mike B <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET>
Subject: Re: Bad fuel economy (solution)
In-Reply-To: <BAY179-DS258BD9B61D69E4C93D1A35A0370@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Most people have absolutely no idea what this will do to your car. Why
even bother looking into the subject, as I have done. You (and most of
the rest of society) are obviously happier not knowing the details on
this subject. If you do know, then why don't you explain to all of us
about the long term effects of using this fuel in older vehicles. It
has been well known and thoroughly documented for years. Long-term fuel
storage (phase separation) water absorption, damaged steel fuel tanks,
steel fuel lines, rubber fuel hoses, fuel pumps (both electric and
mechanical), fuel injector erosion and ultimately entire engines
destroyed due to overheating from running a fuel that they were never
engineered to run. Just keep your head in sand, Dennis.
Or should I say, keep drinking the Kool-Aid. Don't worry, you're in good
company. We'll all adapt, for sure, when we all get rid of our old
vehicles. That's the big plan.
Mike B.
On 9/1/2013 2:17 AM, Dennis Haynes wrote:
> The ethanol is really not going to kill our vehicles any more than unleaded
> fuel or modern engine oil or even current antifreeze. The ethanol bend helps
> reduce pollution as it is a safer oxygenate then MTBE. The oxygenate helps
> reduce carbon monoxide emissions particularly for short engine cycles and
> cold climate areas. In addition ethanol is a cleaner burning fuel than
> gasoline. There is probably also a benefit of the ethanol burning
> characteristics reducing the formation of NOx. Yes there is an economy and
> performance hit. However the EPA is working to have all of use 15% so we
> just have to adapt. Just like all diesel will be 15% bio-diesel soon.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
> Mike B
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:40 PM
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Re: Bad fuel economy (solution)
>
> I don't see how adding ethanol to gasoline could translate to even "maybe a
> little cleaner environment", when the main reason they do it is for
> economical reasons. They water down the gas with something cheaper that's
> not as good as gas, then you get the privilege of paying more for it, too!
> And because it nets less BTU's of energy to your engine, that means less
> miles per gallon of 'fuel' burned, so you end up buying more gallons! This
> also means that you're 'net' burning more 'fuel' in total per year. More
> fuel burned times every vehicle on the road, means increased emissions to
> the atmosphere! All around, a BAD DEAL!
> And yes, 15 percent ethanol will kill many older vehicles, like our
> beloved VW's! I recently heard about one way to help prolong their
> inevitable demise, a fuel additive that uses enzymes to eat the ethanol and
> clean out the gunk left in the fuel system;
>
> http://mystarbrite.com/startron//content/view/14/37/lang,en/
>
> Mike B.
>
>
> On 8/30/2013 10:43 PM, JRodgers wrote:
>> Over tiome that difference begins to add up in dollars and cents. AND
>> what's worse - it's a false economy on fuel pricing. The only place we
>> do gain is MAYBE a little cleaner environment - but we are paying more
>> for less. Maybe the diesel folks have it right - even at higher fuel
>> prices.
>>
>> I'm concerned about a move towards more alcohol in the fuel. At 15% it
>> will kill most vintage cars like Vanagons.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 8/30/2013 9:19 PM, KIM BRENNAN wrote:
>>> FWIW, I've seen (across 7 cars) a 10% reduction in fuel economy for
>>> the gas with 10% alcohol.
>>> Only in my camper was it a 20% reduction.
>>> This evening I confirmed, that with 10% alcohol gas, the fuel economy
>>> is only 11-12mpg, as opposed to 15-16mpg on pure gas.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 30, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Timmy Evens <monkey_lips@YAHOO.COM> wrote:
>>>
>>>> the btu's in a gallon of 10 % ethanol isn't much different than
>>>> straight gas. would not attribute to alcohol. maybe maybe bad O2
>>>> sensor?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
>>>>
>>>>
| 
